Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1186/s12874-020-01059-y http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s12874-020-01059-y 32615936!7330264!32615936     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       BMC+Med+Res+Methodol 2020 ; 20 (1): 177 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32615936|t=2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): an evidence map of medical literature |pdf=|usr=}}{{32615936}} gab.com Text Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): an evidence map of medical literature JO: BMC Med Res Methodol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32615936 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak in December 2019, a substantial body of COVID-19 medical literature has been generated. As of June 2020, gaps and longitudinal trends in the COVID-19 medical literature remain unidentified, despite potential benefits for research prioritisation and policy setting in both the COVID-19 pandemic and future large-scale public health crises. METHODS: In this paper, we searched PubMed and Embase for medical literature on COVID-19 between 1 January and 24 March 2020. We characterised the growth of the early COVID-19 medical literature using evidence maps and bibliometric analyses to elicit cross-sectional and longitudinal trends and systematically identify gaps. RESULTS: The early COVID-19 medical literature originated primarily from Asia and focused mainly on clinical features and diagnosis of the disease. Many areas of potential research remain underexplored, such as mental health, the use of novel technologies and artificial intelligence, pathophysiology of COVID-19 within different body systems, and indirect effects of COVID-19 on the care of non-COVID-19 patients. Few articles involved research collaboration at the international level (24.7%). The median submission-to-publication duration was 8 days (interquartile range: 4-16). CONCLUSIONS: Although in its early phase, COVID-19 research has generated a large volume of publications. However, there are still knowledge gaps yet to be filled and areas for improvement for the global research community. Our analysis of early COVID-19 research may be valuable in informing research prioritisation and policy planning both in the current COVID-19 pandemic and similar global health crises. Twit Text FOAVip Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): an evidence map of medical literature ????BMC Med Res Methodol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32615936 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32615936 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32615936}}</ref> Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): an evidence map of medical literature #MMPMID32615936 Liu N; Chee ML; Niu C; Pek PP; Siddiqui FJ; Ansah JP; Matchar DB; Lam SSW; Abdullah HR; Chan A; Malhotra R; Graves N; Koh MS; Yoon S; Ho AFW; Ting DSW; Low JGH; Ong MEH BMC Med Res Methodol 2020[Jul]; 20 (1): 177 PMID32615936show ga BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak in December 2019, a substantial body of COVID-19 medical literature has been generated. As of June 2020, gaps and longitudinal trends in the COVID-19 medical literature remain unidentified, despite potential benefits for research prioritisation and policy setting in both the COVID-19 pandemic and future large-scale public health crises. METHODS: In this paper, we searched PubMed and Embase for medical literature on COVID-19 between 1 January and 24 March 2020. We characterised the growth of the early COVID-19 medical literature using evidence maps and bibliometric analyses to elicit cross-sectional and longitudinal trends and systematically identify gaps. RESULTS: The early COVID-19 medical literature originated primarily from Asia and focused mainly on clinical features and diagnosis of the disease. Many areas of potential research remain underexplored, such as mental health, the use of novel technologies and artificial intelligence, pathophysiology of COVID-19 within different body systems, and indirect effects of COVID-19 on the care of non-COVID-19 patients. Few articles involved research collaboration at the international level (24.7%). The median submission-to-publication duration was 8 days (interquartile range: 4-16). CONCLUSIONS: Although in its early phase, COVID-19 research has generated a large volume of publications. However, there are still knowledge gaps yet to be filled and areas for improvement for the global research community. Our analysis of early COVID-19 research may be valuable in informing research prioritisation and policy planning both in the current COVID-19 pandemic and similar global health crises. |*Bibliometrics[MESH] |*Coronavirus Infections[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |*Periodicals as Topic[MESH] |*Pneumonia, Viral[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Literature[MESH]Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): an evidence map of medical litera(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing