Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1007/s00586-020-06516-2

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s00586-020-06516-2
suck pdf from google scholar
32601848!7324002!32601848
unlimited free pdf from europmc32601848    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32601848&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32601848      Eur+Spine+J 2020 ; 29 (10): 2409-2412
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Management of patients with magnetically controlled growth rods amidst the global COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID32601848
  • Hothi H; Tucker S; Shafafy M; Nnadi C; Cheung KMC; Dal Gal E; Tognini M; Henckel J; Skinner J; Hart A
  • Eur Spine J 2020[Oct]; 29 (10): 2409-2412 PMID32601848show ga
  • INTRODUCTION: At the time of writing, we are all coping with the global COVID-19 pandemic. Amongst other things, this has had a significant impact on postponing virtually all routine clinic visits and elective surgeries. Concurrently, the Magnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) rod has been issued with a number of field safety notices and UK regulator medical device alerts. METHODS: This document serves to provide an overview of the current situation regarding the use of MAGEC rods, primarily in the UK, and the impact that the pandemic has had on the management of patients with these rods. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The care of each patient must of course be determined on an individual basis; however, the experience of the authors is that a short delay in scheduled distractions and clinic visits will not adversely impact patient treatment. The authors caution against a gap in distractions of longer than 6 months and emphasise the importance of continued remote patient monitoring to identify those who may need to be seen more urgently.
  • |*Betacoronavirus[MESH]
  • |*Magnets[MESH]
  • |*Patient Safety/standards[MESH]
  • |*Prostheses and Implants[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Child[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Health Care Rationing/methods/standards[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Infection Control/methods/standards[MESH]
  • |Osteogenesis, Distraction/instrumentation/*methods/standards[MESH]
  • |Pandemics/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Practice Guidelines as Topic[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Scoliosis/*surgery[MESH]
  • |Telemedicine/methods/standards[MESH]
  • |Time Factors[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box