Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1177/1359104520937378

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/1359104520937378
suck pdf from google scholar
32594756!7370649!32594756
unlimited free pdf from europmc32594756    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32594756      Clin+Child+Psychol+Psychiatry 2020 ; 25 (3): 672-686
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Business as usual? Psychological support at a distance #MMPMID32594756
  • Payne L; Flannery H; Kambakara Gedara C; Daniilidi X; Hitchcock M; Lambert D; Taylor C; Christie D
  • Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2020[Jul]; 25 (3): 672-686 PMID32594756show ga
  • The impact of COVID-19 has challenged the long accepted 'norm' in delivery of psychological therapy. Public policies designed to reduce transmission have made it extremely difficult to meet with service-users safely in the traditional face-to-face context. E-therapies have existed in theory and practice since technological progress has made them possible. They can offer a host of advantages over face-to-face equivalents, including improved access, greater flexibility for service-users and professionals, and cost savings. However, despite the emerging evidence and anticipated positive value, implementation has been slower than anticipated. Concerns have been raised by service-users, clinicians, and public health organisations, identifying significant barriers to the wide spread use of e-therapies. In the current climate, many clinicians are offering e-therapies for the first time, without prior arrangement or training, as the only viable option to continue to support their clients. This paper offers a clinically relevant review of the e-therapies literature, including effectiveness and acceptability dilemmas and challenges that need to be addressed to support the safe use and growth of e-therapies in psychology services. Further research is needed to better understand what might be lost and what gained in comparison to face-to-face therapy, and for which client groups and settings it might be most effective.
  • |*Attitude of Health Personnel[MESH]
  • |*Patient Acceptance of Health Care[MESH]
  • |*Psychiatry[MESH]
  • |*Psychology[MESH]
  • |*Telemedicine[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Betacoronavirus[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Child[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Psychotherapy, Group[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Telephone[MESH]
  • |Treatment Outcome[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box