Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102187 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102187 32589695!7296304!32589695     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       ä-/-ä 2020 ; 46 (5): 102187 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32589695|t=2020. An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues |pdf=|usr=}}{{32589695}} gab.com Text An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues JO: ä-/-ä http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32589695 #FOAvip The COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to a flood of papers and preprints, has placed multiple challenges on academic publishing, the most obvious one being sustained integrity under the pressure to publish quickly. There are risks of this high volume-to-speed ratio. Many letters, editorials, and supposedly "peer reviewed" papers in ranked and indexed journals were published in a matter of days, suggesting that peer review was either fleeting or non-existential, or that papers were rapidly approved by editors based on their perceived interest and topicality, rather than on their intrinsic academic value. In academic publishing circles, the claim of "peer review", when in fact it has not been conducted, is a core characteristic of "predatory publishing", and is also a "fake" element that may undermine efforts in recent years to build trust in science's budding serials crisis. While the world is still centrally focused on COVID-19, the issue of "predatory publishing" is being ignored, or not being given sufficient attention. The risks to the scholarly community, academic publishing and ultimately public health are at stake when exploitative and predatory publishing are left unchallenged. Twit Text FOAVip An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues ????ä-/-ä http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32589695 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32589695 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32589695}}</ref> An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues #MMPMID32589695 Teixeira da Silva JA ä-/-ä 2020[Sep]; 46 (5): 102187 PMID32589695show ga The COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to a flood of papers and preprints, has placed multiple challenges on academic publishing, the most obvious one being sustained integrity under the pressure to publish quickly. There are risks of this high volume-to-speed ratio. Many letters, editorials, and supposedly "peer reviewed" papers in ranked and indexed journals were published in a matter of days, suggesting that peer review was either fleeting or non-existential, or that papers were rapidly approved by editors based on their perceived interest and topicality, rather than on their intrinsic academic value. In academic publishing circles, the claim of "peer review", when in fact it has not been conducted, is a core characteristic of "predatory publishing", and is also a "fake" element that may undermine efforts in recent years to build trust in science's budding serials crisis. While the world is still centrally focused on COVID-19, the issue of "predatory publishing" is being ignored, or not being given sufficient attention. The risks to the scholarly community, academic publishing and ultimately public health are at stake when exploitative and predatory publishing are left unchallenged. äAn Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing