Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1093/infdis/jiaa352 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/infdis/jiaa352 32582943!7337820!32582943     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32582943&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Infect+Dis 2020 ; 222 (5): 715-718 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32582943|t=2020. Ethical Implementation of Immunity Passports During the COVID-19 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{32582943}} gab.com Text Ethical Implementation of Immunity Passports During the COVID-19 Pandemic JO: J Infect Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32582943 #FOAvip A number of countries are planning the use of "immunity passports" as a way to ease restrictive measures and allow infected and recovered people to return to work during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper brings together key scientific uncertainties regarding the use of serological tests to assure immune status and a public health ethics perspective to inform key considerations in the ethical implementation of immunity passport policies. Ill-conceived policies have the potential to cause severe unintended harms that could result in greater inequity, the stigmatization of certain sectors of society, and heightened risks and unequal treatment of individuals due to erroneous test results. Immunity passports could, however, be used to achieve collective benefits and benefits for specific populations besides facilitating economic recovery. We conclude that sector-based policies that prioritize access to testing based on societal need are likely to be fairer and logistically more feasible, while minimizing stigma and reducing incentives for fraud. Clear guidelines need to be set out for which sectors of society should be prioritized for testing, and rigorous mechanisms should be in place to validate test results and identify cases of reinfection. Twit Text FOAVip Ethical Implementation of Immunity Passports During the COVID-19 Pandemic ????J Infect Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32582943 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32582943 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32582943}}</ref> Ethical Implementation of Immunity Passports During the COVID-19 Pandemic #MMPMID32582943 Voo TC; Clapham H; Tam CC J Infect Dis 2020[Aug]; 222 (5): 715-718 PMID32582943show ga A number of countries are planning the use of "immunity passports" as a way to ease restrictive measures and allow infected and recovered people to return to work during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper brings together key scientific uncertainties regarding the use of serological tests to assure immune status and a public health ethics perspective to inform key considerations in the ethical implementation of immunity passport policies. Ill-conceived policies have the potential to cause severe unintended harms that could result in greater inequity, the stigmatization of certain sectors of society, and heightened risks and unequal treatment of individuals due to erroneous test results. Immunity passports could, however, be used to achieve collective benefits and benefits for specific populations besides facilitating economic recovery. We conclude that sector-based policies that prioritize access to testing based on societal need are likely to be fairer and logistically more feasible, while minimizing stigma and reducing incentives for fraud. Clear guidelines need to be set out for which sectors of society should be prioritized for testing, and rigorous mechanisms should be in place to validate test results and identify cases of reinfection. |Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing[MESH] |Certification/ethics[MESH] |Clinical Laboratory Techniques[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis/*immunology/prevention & control[MESH] |Health Policy[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Immunity[MESH] |Pandemics/*ethics/prevention & control[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*immunology/prevention & control[MESH] |Public Health/*ethics[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Ethical Implementation of Immunity Passports During the COVID-19 Pande(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing