Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1038/s41598-020-67211-2 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/s41598-020-67211-2 32581288!7314750!32581288     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Sci+Rep 2020 ; 10 (1): 10285 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32581288|t=2020. Far-UVC light (222 nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronaviruses |pdf=|usr=}}{{32581288}} gab.com Text Far-UVC light (222 nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronaviruses JO: Sci Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32581288 #FOAvip A direct approach to limit airborne viral transmissions is to inactivate them within a short time of their production. Germicidal ultraviolet light, typically at 254 nm, is effective in this context but, used directly, can be a health hazard to skin and eyes. By contrast, far-UVC light (207-222 nm) efficiently kills pathogens potentially without harm to exposed human tissues. We previously demonstrated that 222-nm far-UVC light efficiently kills airborne influenza virus and we extend those studies to explore far-UVC efficacy against airborne human coronaviruses alpha HCoV-229E and beta HCoV-OC43. Low doses of 1.7 and 1.2 mJ/cm(2) inactivated 99.9% of aerosolized coronavirus 229E and OC43, respectively. As all human coronaviruses have similar genomic sizes, far-UVC light would be expected to show similar inactivation efficiency against other human coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2. Based on the beta-HCoV-OC43 results, continuous far-UVC exposure in occupied public locations at the current regulatory exposure limit (~3 mJ/cm(2)/hour) would result in ~90% viral inactivation in ~8 minutes, 95% in ~11 minutes, 99% in ~16 minutes and 99.9% inactivation in ~25 minutes. Thus while staying within current regulatory dose limits, low-dose-rate far-UVC exposure can potentially safely provide a major reduction in the ambient level of airborne coronaviruses in occupied public locations. Twit Text FOAVip Far-UVC light (222 nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronaviruses ????Sci Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32581288 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32581288 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32581288}}</ref> Far-UVC light (222 nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronaviruses #MMPMID32581288 Buonanno M; Welch D; Shuryak I; Brenner DJ Sci Rep 2020[Jun]; 10 (1): 10285 PMID32581288show ga A direct approach to limit airborne viral transmissions is to inactivate them within a short time of their production. Germicidal ultraviolet light, typically at 254 nm, is effective in this context but, used directly, can be a health hazard to skin and eyes. By contrast, far-UVC light (207-222 nm) efficiently kills pathogens potentially without harm to exposed human tissues. We previously demonstrated that 222-nm far-UVC light efficiently kills airborne influenza virus and we extend those studies to explore far-UVC efficacy against airborne human coronaviruses alpha HCoV-229E and beta HCoV-OC43. Low doses of 1.7 and 1.2 mJ/cm(2) inactivated 99.9% of aerosolized coronavirus 229E and OC43, respectively. As all human coronaviruses have similar genomic sizes, far-UVC light would be expected to show similar inactivation efficiency against other human coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2. Based on the beta-HCoV-OC43 results, continuous far-UVC exposure in occupied public locations at the current regulatory exposure limit (~3 mJ/cm(2)/hour) would result in ~90% viral inactivation in ~8 minutes, 95% in ~11 minutes, 99% in ~16 minutes and 99.9% inactivation in ~25 minutes. Thus while staying within current regulatory dose limits, low-dose-rate far-UVC exposure can potentially safely provide a major reduction in the ambient level of airborne coronaviruses in occupied public locations. |Antiviral Agents/*adverse effects[MESH] |Betacoronavirus/*radiation effects[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Cell Line[MESH] |Coronavirus 229E, Human/radiation effects[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/radiotherapy[MESH] |Coronavirus OC43, Human/radiation effects[MESH] |Disinfection/*methods[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Particulate Matter/radiation effects[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/radiotherapy[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/radiation effects[MESH] |Ultraviolet Rays/*adverse effects[MESH]Far-UVC light (222 nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne hum(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing