Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/eci.13323 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/eci.13323 32558931!7323033!32558931     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Eur+J+Clin+Invest 2020 ; 50 (9): e13323 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32558931|t=2020. Tracing open data in emergencies: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{32558931}} gab.com Text Tracing open data in emergencies: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic JO: Eur J Clin Invest http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32558931 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic constitutes an ongoing, burning Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). In 2015, the World Health Organization adopted an open data policy recommendation in such situations. OBJECTIVES: The present cross-sectional meta-research study aimed to assess the availability of open data and metrics of articles pertaining to the COVID-19 outbreak in five high-impact journals. METHODS: All articles regarding the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), published in five high-impact journals (Ann Intern Med, BMJ, JAMA, NEJM and Lancet) until March 14, 2020 were retrieved. Metadata (namely the type of article, number of authors, number of patients, citations, errata, news and social media mentions) were extracted for each article in each journal in a systematic way. Google Scholar and Scopus were used for citations and author metrics respectively, and Altmetrics and PlumX were used for news and social media mentions retrieval. The degree of adherence to the PHEIC open data call was also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 140 articles were published until March 14, 2020, mostly opinion papers. Sixteen errata followed these publications. The number of authors in each article ranged from 1 to 63, whereas the number of patients with a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection reached 2645. Extensive hyperauthorship was evident among case studies. The impact of these publications reached a total of 4210 cumulative crude citations and 342 790 news and social media mentions. Only one publication (0.7%) provided complete open data, while 32 (22.9%) included patient data. CONCLUSIONS: Even though a large number of manuscripts was produced since the pandemic, availability of open data remains restricted. Twit Text FOAVip Tracing open data in emergencies: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic ????Eur J Clin Invest http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32558931 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32558931 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32558931}}</ref> Tracing open data in emergencies: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID32558931 Gkiouras K; Nigdelis MP; Grammatikopoulou MG; Goulis DG Eur J Clin Invest 2020[Sep]; 50 (9): e13323 PMID32558931show ga BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic constitutes an ongoing, burning Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). In 2015, the World Health Organization adopted an open data policy recommendation in such situations. OBJECTIVES: The present cross-sectional meta-research study aimed to assess the availability of open data and metrics of articles pertaining to the COVID-19 outbreak in five high-impact journals. METHODS: All articles regarding the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), published in five high-impact journals (Ann Intern Med, BMJ, JAMA, NEJM and Lancet) until March 14, 2020 were retrieved. Metadata (namely the type of article, number of authors, number of patients, citations, errata, news and social media mentions) were extracted for each article in each journal in a systematic way. Google Scholar and Scopus were used for citations and author metrics respectively, and Altmetrics and PlumX were used for news and social media mentions retrieval. The degree of adherence to the PHEIC open data call was also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 140 articles were published until March 14, 2020, mostly opinion papers. Sixteen errata followed these publications. The number of authors in each article ranged from 1 to 63, whereas the number of patients with a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection reached 2645. Extensive hyperauthorship was evident among case studies. The impact of these publications reached a total of 4210 cumulative crude citations and 342 790 news and social media mentions. Only one publication (0.7%) provided complete open data, while 32 (22.9%) included patient data. CONCLUSIONS: Even though a large number of manuscripts was produced since the pandemic, availability of open data remains restricted. |*Information Dissemination[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology[MESH] |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH] |Data Mining[MESH] |Emergencies[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Pandemics/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Periodicals as Topic[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*epidemiology[MESH] |Publications/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Research Design[MESH]Tracing open data in emergencies: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing