Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1128/JCM.00995-20

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1128/JCM.00995-20
suck pdf from google scholar
32513858!7383556!32513858
unlimited free pdf from europmc32513858    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32513858      J+Clin+Microbiol 2020 ; 58 (8): ä
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Tests #MMPMID32513858
  • Green DA; Zucker J; Westblade LF; Whittier S; Rennert H; Velu P; Craney A; Cushing M; Liu D; Sobieszczyk ME; Boehme AK; Sepulveda JL
  • J Clin Microbiol 2020[Jul]; 58 (8): ä PMID32513858show ga
  • Molecular testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the gold standard for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the clinical performance of these tests is still poorly understood, particularly with regard to disease course, patient-specific factors, and viral shedding. From 10 March to 1 May 2020, NewYork-Presbyterian laboratories performed 27,377 SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays from 22,338 patients. Repeat testing was performed for 3,432 patients, of which 2,413 had initial negative and 802 had initial positive results. Repeat-tested patients were more likely to have severe disease and low viral loads. The negative predictive value of the first-day result among repeat-tested patients was 81.3% The clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays was estimated between 58% and 96%, depending on the unknown number of false-negative results in single-tested patients. Conversion to negative was unlikely to occur before 15 to 20 days after initial testing or 20 to 30 days after the onset of symptoms, with 50% conversion occurring at 28 days after initial testing. Conversion from first-day negative to positive results increased linearly with each day of testing, reaching 25% probability in 20 days. Sixty patients fluctuated between positive and negative results over several weeks, suggesting that caution is needed when single-test results are acted upon. In summary, our study provides estimates of the clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays and suggests time frames for appropriate repeat testing, namely, 15 to 20 days after a positive test and the same day or next 2 days after a negative test for patients with high suspicion for COVID-19.
  • |Adolescent[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Aged, 80 and over[MESH]
  • |Betacoronavirus/genetics/*isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Testing[MESH]
  • |Child[MESH]
  • |Child, Preschool[MESH]
  • |Clinical Laboratory Techniques/*methods[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/*diagnosis/pathology/virology[MESH]
  • |Diagnostic Tests, Routine/*methods[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Infant[MESH]
  • |Infant, Newborn[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |New York[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/*diagnosis/pathology/virology[MESH]
  • |Predictive Value of Tests[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]
  • |Viral Load[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box