Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1017/S0963180120000468 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1017/S0963180120000468 32507121!7360936!32507121     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Camb+Q+Healthc+Ethics 2021 ; 30 (1): 25-36 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32507121|t=2021. COVID-19 and Health-Related Authority Allocation Puzzles |pdf=|usr=}}{{32507121}} gab.com Text COVID-19 and Health-Related Authority Allocation Puzzles JO: Camb Q Healthc Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32507121 #FOAvip COVID-19-related controversies concerning the allocation of scarce resources, travel restrictions, and physical distancing norms each raise a foundational question: How should authority, and thus responsibility, over healthcare and public health law and policy be allocated? Each controversy raises principles that support claims by traditional wielders of authority in "federal" countries, like federal and state governments, and less traditional entities, like cities and sub-state nations. No existing principle divides "healthcare and public law and policy" into units that can be allocated in intuitively compelling ways. This leads to puzzles concerning (a) the principles for justifiably allocating "powers" in these domains and (b) whether and how they change during "emergencies." This work motivates the puzzles, explains why resolving them should be part of long-term responses to COVID-19, and outlines some initial COVID-19-related findings that shed light on justifiable authority allocation, emergencies, emergency powers, and the relationships between them. Twit Text FOAVip COVID-19 and Health-Related Authority Allocation Puzzles ????Camb Q Healthc Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32507121 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32507121 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32507121}}</ref> COVID-19 and Health-Related Authority Allocation Puzzles #MMPMID32507121 DA Silva M Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2021[Jan]; 30 (1): 25-36 PMID32507121show ga COVID-19-related controversies concerning the allocation of scarce resources, travel restrictions, and physical distancing norms each raise a foundational question: How should authority, and thus responsibility, over healthcare and public health law and policy be allocated? Each controversy raises principles that support claims by traditional wielders of authority in "federal" countries, like federal and state governments, and less traditional entities, like cities and sub-state nations. No existing principle divides "healthcare and public law and policy" into units that can be allocated in intuitively compelling ways. This leads to puzzles concerning (a) the principles for justifiably allocating "powers" in these domains and (b) whether and how they change during "emergencies." This work motivates the puzzles, explains why resolving them should be part of long-term responses to COVID-19, and outlines some initial COVID-19-related findings that shed light on justifiable authority allocation, emergencies, emergency powers, and the relationships between them. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Resource Allocation/legislation & jurisprudence[MESH] |Delivery of Health Care[MESH] |Emergency Medical Services[MESH] |Health Policy[MESH] |Humans[MESH]COVID-19 and Health-Related Authority Allocation Puzzles (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing