Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.21873/invivo.11951

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.21873/invivo.11951
suck pdf from google scholar
32503819!8378023!32503819
unlimited free pdf from europmc32503819    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid32503819      In+Vivo 2020 ; 34 (3 Suppl): 1613-1617
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A Machine Learning Bibliometric Analysis #MMPMID32503819
  • DE Felice F; Polimeni A
  • In Vivo 2020[Jun]; 34 (3 Suppl): 1613-1617 PMID32503819show ga
  • BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the research trends in coronavirus disease (COVID-19). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A bibliometric analysis was performed using a machine learning bibliometric methodology. Information regarding publication outputs, countries, institutions, journals, keywords, funding and citation counts was retrieved from Scopus database. RESULTS: A total of 1883 eligible papers were returned. An exponential increase in the COVID-19 publications occurred in the last months. As expected, China produced the majority of articles, followed by the United States of America, the United Kingdom and Italy. There is greater collaboration between highly contributing authors and institutions. The "BMJ" published the highest number of papers (n=129) and "The Lancet" had the most citations (n=1439). The most ubiquitous topic was COVID-19 clinical features. CONCLUSION: This bibliometric analysis presents the most influential references related to COVID-19 during this time and could be useful to improve understanding and management of COVID-19.
  • |*Bibliometrics[MESH]
  • |*Coronavirus Infections[MESH]
  • |*Machine Learning[MESH]
  • |*Pandemics[MESH]
  • |*Pneumonia, Viral[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |China[MESH]
  • |Databases, Bibliographic[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Information Dissemination[MESH]
  • |National Institutes of Health (U.S.)[MESH]
  • |Publishing/statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Research Support as Topic[MESH]
  • |Research/statistics & numerical data[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box