Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.05.020

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.05.020
suck pdf from google scholar
32499159!7255346!32499159
unlimited free pdf from europmc32499159    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32499159      Res+Social+Adm+Pharm 2021 ; 17 (1): 1882-1887
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Community pharmacists exposure to COVID-19 #MMPMID32499159
  • Cabas P; Di Bella S; Giuffre M; Rizzo M; Trombetta C; Luzzati R; Antonello RM; Parenzan K; Liguori G
  • Res Social Adm Pharm 2021[Jan]; 17 (1): 1882-1887 PMID32499159show ga
  • INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the 2020 Sars-CoV-2 Italian outbreak, healthcare workers have been among the most exposed categories. There is little information about community pharmacists' on occupational exposure, symptoms development, and testing practices in the community pharmacist cohort. METHODS: Between April 30th and May 10th, a questionnaire was administered through social media to Italian community pharmacists. From 67000 pharmacists currently working in community pharmacies, 1632 answered the survey. RESULTS: The survey population reflected the general Italian community pharmacists population in terms of age, gender, and number of co-workers. Protective measures were adopted in up to 99.9% of pharmacies. 624 pharmacists (38.2%) developed at least one COVID-19 related symptom in the period between February 28th and May 10th. Also, 102 pharmacists (6.2%) were tested for COVID-19 and 15, the 15% of the tested population and 0.92% of the whole survey population, resulted positive on nasopharyngeal swab. However, while the number of symptomatic pharmacists decreased, a higher number of tests were performed, thus COVID-19 prevalence among community pharmacists could have been underestimated and is probably intermediate between other healthcare workers and the general population (0.31%). CONCLUSION: Community pharmacists have probably been one of the first categories to experience increased contact risk to SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 prevalence among pharmacists could have been underestimated. In addition, the rates of protection measures adoption might have helped to reduce the spread of COVID-19 among co-workers and the community.
  • |*Community Pharmacy Services[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Testing[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/diagnosis/epidemiology/*transmission[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Italy[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Occupational Exposure/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Pharmacists/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Prevalence[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box