Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/ajim.23144 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/ajim.23144 32496602!7300982!32496602     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Am+J+Ind+Med 2020 ; 63 (8): 655-658 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32496602|t=2020. Respiratory protection for health care workers: A 2020 COVID-19 perspective |pdf=|usr=}}{{32496602}} gab.com Text Respiratory protection for health care workers: A 2020 COVID-19 perspective JO: Am J Ind Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32496602 #FOAvip As the US health care system began to respond to the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic, demand for respiratory personal protective equipment (PPE) increased precipitously, as did the number of users. This commentary discusses ensuing deviations from accepted respiratory PPE program practices, which potentially increased risk to health care workers. Such lapses included omitting user training and fit testing, provision of unapproved devices, and application of devices in settings and ways for which they were not intended. The temporary compromise of professionally accepted standards due to exigencies must not become the new normal. Rather, the current attention to PPE should be leveraged to enhance practice, motivate vital research, and strengthen professional, governmental, and institutional capabilities to control health care worker exposures to infectious hazards. Twit Text FOAVip Respiratory protection for health care workers: A 2020 COVID-19 perspective ????Am J Ind Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32496602 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32496602 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32496602}}</ref> Respiratory protection for health care workers: A 2020 COVID-19 perspective #MMPMID32496602 Petsonk EL; Harber P Am J Ind Med 2020[Aug]; 63 (8): 655-658 PMID32496602show ga As the US health care system began to respond to the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic, demand for respiratory personal protective equipment (PPE) increased precipitously, as did the number of users. This commentary discusses ensuing deviations from accepted respiratory PPE program practices, which potentially increased risk to health care workers. Such lapses included omitting user training and fit testing, provision of unapproved devices, and application of devices in settings and ways for which they were not intended. The temporary compromise of professionally accepted standards due to exigencies must not become the new normal. Rather, the current attention to PPE should be leveraged to enhance practice, motivate vital research, and strengthen professional, governmental, and institutional capabilities to control health care worker exposures to infectious hazards. |*Betacoronavirus[MESH] |*Health Personnel[MESH] |*Personal Protective Equipment[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*prevention & control[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Infection Control/methods/*standards[MESH] |Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/*prevention & control[MESH] |Pandemics/*prevention & control[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*prevention & control[MESH]Respiratory protection for health care workers: A 2020 COVID-19 perspe(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing