Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002494 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002494 32491096!7190095!32491096     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Rev+Saude+Publica 2020 ; 54 (ä): 47 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32491096|t=2020. Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants |pdf=|usr=}}{{32491096}} gab.com Text Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants JO: Rev Saude Publica http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32491096 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax (R) ). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown's split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education. Twit Text FOAVip Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants ????Rev Saude Publica http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32491096 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32491096 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32491096}}</ref> Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants #MMPMID32491096 Costa MF Rev Saude Publica 2020[]; 54 (ä): 47 PMID32491096show ga OBJECTIVE To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax (R) ). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown's split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education. |*Betacoronavirus[MESH] |*Culture[MESH] |Adolescent[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Brazil[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*psychology/*transmission[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Models, Psychological[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*psychology/*transmission[MESH] |Reference Values[MESH] |Reproducibility of Results[MESH] |Risk Assessment/*methods[MESH] |Risk Factors[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Socioeconomic Factors[MESH] |Surveys and Questionnaires/*standards[MESH]Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing