Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455 32485618!7240272!32485618     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Clin+Virol 2020 ; 129 (ä): 104455 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32485618|t=2020. Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis |pdf=|usr=}}{{32485618}} gab.com Text Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis JO: J Clin Virol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32485618 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Ensuring accurate diagnosis is essential to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and for the clinical management of COVID-19. Although real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT- qPCR) is the current recommended laboratory method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 acute infection, several factors such as requirement of special equipment and skilled staff limit the use of these time-consuming molecular techniques. Recently, several easy to perform rapid antigen detection tests were developed and recommended in some countries as the first line of diagnostic. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of the Coris COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip test, a rapid immunochromatographic test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen, in comparison to RT-qPCR. RESULTS: 148 nasopharyngeal swabs were tested. Amongst the 106 positive RT-qPCR samples, 32 were detected by the rapid antigen test, given an overall sensitivity of 30.2%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also positive with RT-qPCR. CONCLUSIONS: Higher viral loads are associated with better antigen detection rates. Unfortunately, the overall poor sensitivity of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. Twit Text FOAVip Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis ????J Clin Virol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32485618 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32485618 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32485618}}</ref> Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis #MMPMID32485618 Scohy A; Anantharajah A; Bodeus M; Kabamba-Mukadi B; Verroken A; Rodriguez-Villalobos H J Clin Virol 2020[Aug]; 129 (ä): 104455 PMID32485618show ga BACKGROUND: Ensuring accurate diagnosis is essential to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and for the clinical management of COVID-19. Although real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT- qPCR) is the current recommended laboratory method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 acute infection, several factors such as requirement of special equipment and skilled staff limit the use of these time-consuming molecular techniques. Recently, several easy to perform rapid antigen detection tests were developed and recommended in some countries as the first line of diagnostic. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of the Coris COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip test, a rapid immunochromatographic test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen, in comparison to RT-qPCR. RESULTS: 148 nasopharyngeal swabs were tested. Amongst the 106 positive RT-qPCR samples, 32 were detected by the rapid antigen test, given an overall sensitivity of 30.2%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also positive with RT-qPCR. CONCLUSIONS: Higher viral loads are associated with better antigen detection rates. Unfortunately, the overall poor sensitivity of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. |Adolescent[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Aged, 80 and over[MESH] |Animals[MESH] |Antigens, Viral/*analysis[MESH] |Betacoronavirus/immunology/*isolation & purification[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing[MESH] |Child[MESH] |Child, Preschool[MESH] |Clinical Laboratory Techniques/*methods[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*diagnosis[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Immunoassay/*methods[MESH] |Infant[MESH] |Infant, Newborn[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Nasopharynx/virology[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*diagnosis[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing f(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing