Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1097/BSD.0000000000001017 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001017 32482971!ä!32482971 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Clin+Spine+Surg 2020 ; 33 (6): 244-246 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32482971|t=2020. Disproportionate Case Reduction After Ban of Elective Surgeries During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{32482971}} gab.com Text Disproportionate Case Reduction After Ban of Elective Surgeries During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic JO: Clin Spine Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32482971 #FOAvip STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case analysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to illustrate the numerical effects of regulatory restrictions of elective surgery at an orthopaedic university hospital. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic all over the world places extraordinary demands on health care systems which are forced to ensure structural and personnel capacities. Consequently, hospitals may only perform urgent interventions. Spine patients, however, often need urgent surgery and, moreover, bear an above-average perioperative risk frequently requiring postoperative surveillance on intensive care units (ICUs). Facing this dilemma, we want to share our practice and its unexpected numerical effects. METHODS: We compare case statistics during normal operation, directly before and after implementation of regulatory measures. We also analyzed the differences in ICU utilization, complexity and duration of interventions and the patient population. RESULTS: Spine surgical interventions have been reduced by 42.7%. Regulatory restriction of "elective surgeries" in pandemic situations results in reduced ICU utilization, however in a disproportionate manner. Although other specialized surgeries can be reduced by 59%, surgical spine cases are only diminishable by 24%. The spine surgery-related ICU occupancy has been reduced by 35%. CONCLUSION: The disproportionate effect of case reduction needs to be considered while calculating resources released by regulatory limitation of "elective surgeries" on a (inter-)national level. Twit Text FOAVip Disproportionate Case Reduction After Ban of Elective Surgeries During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic ????Clin Spine Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32482971 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32482971 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32482971}}</ref> Disproportionate Case Reduction After Ban of Elective Surgeries During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic #MMPMID32482971 Laux CJ; Bauer DE; Kohler A; Uckay I; Farshad M Clin Spine Surg 2020[Jul]; 33 (6): 244-246 PMID32482971show ga STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case analysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to illustrate the numerical effects of regulatory restrictions of elective surgery at an orthopaedic university hospital. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic all over the world places extraordinary demands on health care systems which are forced to ensure structural and personnel capacities. Consequently, hospitals may only perform urgent interventions. Spine patients, however, often need urgent surgery and, moreover, bear an above-average perioperative risk frequently requiring postoperative surveillance on intensive care units (ICUs). Facing this dilemma, we want to share our practice and its unexpected numerical effects. METHODS: We compare case statistics during normal operation, directly before and after implementation of regulatory measures. We also analyzed the differences in ICU utilization, complexity and duration of interventions and the patient population. RESULTS: Spine surgical interventions have been reduced by 42.7%. Regulatory restriction of "elective surgeries" in pandemic situations results in reduced ICU utilization, however in a disproportionate manner. Although other specialized surgeries can be reduced by 59%, surgical spine cases are only diminishable by 24%. The spine surgery-related ICU occupancy has been reduced by 35%. CONCLUSION: The disproportionate effect of case reduction needs to be considered while calculating resources released by regulatory limitation of "elective surgeries" on a (inter-)national level. |*Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology/*prevention & control[MESH] |Critical Care/statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Elective Surgical Procedures/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Hospitals, University[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Operative Time[MESH] |Orthopedics/organization & administration[MESH] |Pandemics/*prevention & control[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*epidemiology/*prevention & control[MESH] |Retrospective Studies[MESH] |Risk[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Spine/*surgery[MESH]Disproportionate Case Reduction After Ban of Elective Surgeries During(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing