Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi

suck pdf from helios

10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.049

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.049
suck pdf from google scholar
32474039!7255987!32474039
unlimited free pdf from europmc32474039    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free
PDF vom PMID32474039  :  Publisher
PDF vom PMID32474039

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32474039
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Applicability of the CURB-65 pneumonia severity score for outpatient treatment of COVID-19 #MMPMID32474039
  • Nguyen Y; Corre F; Honsel V; Curac S; Zarrouk V; Fantin B; Galy A
  • J Infect 2020[Sep]; 81 (3): e96-e98 PMID32474039show ga
  • OBJECTIVES: The CURB-65 is a severity score to predict mortality secondary to community acquired pneumonia and is widely used to identify patients who can be managed as outpatients. However, whether CURB-65 can be applicable to COVID-19 patients for the decision of outpatient treatment is still unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study assessing the performance of the CURB-65 to predict the risk of poor outcome, defined as the need for mechanical ventilation and/or death, among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The association between the CURB-65 and the outcome was assessed by a univariable Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients were hospitalized between March 15(th) and April 14(th), 2020. According to the CURB-65, 171 (61.3%) patients were considered at low risk (CURB-65 01), 66 (23.7%) at intermediate risk (CURB-65=2), and 42 (15.1%) had high risk of 30-day mortality (CURB-65 35). During the study period, 88 (31.5%) patients had a poor outcome. The CURB-65 was strongly associated with a poor outcome (Pfor linear trend <0.001). However, among patients with a CURB-65 of 01, thus considered at low risk, 36/171 (21.1%) had a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the applicability of CURB-65 to guide the decision of inpatient or outpatient care is scarce, as it does not safely identify patients who could be managed as outpatients.
  • |*Community-Acquired Infections[MESH]
  • |*Coronavirus[MESH]
  • |*Coronavirus Infections[MESH]
  • |*Pandemics[MESH]
  • |*Pneumonia[MESH]
  • |*Pneumonia, Viral[MESH]
  • |Ambulatory Care[MESH]
  • |Betacoronavirus[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Outpatients[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]
  • |Severity of Illness Index[MESH]
  • |United Kingdom[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    e96 3.81 2020