Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106036 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106036 32469732!7243792!32469732     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32469732&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Respir+Med 2020 ; 170 (ä): 106036 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32469732|t=2020. Chest X-ray features of SARS-CoV-2 in the emergency department: a multicenter experience from northern Italian hospitals |pdf=|usr=}}{{32469732}} gab.com Text Chest X-ray features of SARS-CoV-2 in the emergency department: a multicenter experience from northern Italian hospitals JO: Respir Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32469732 #FOAvip OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the imaging features of routine admission chest X-ray in patients referred for novel Coronavirus 2019 infection. METHODS: All patients referred to the emergency departments, RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection were evaluated. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. Two radiologists (8 and 15 years of experience) reviewed all the X-ray images and evaluated the following findings: interstitial opacities, alveolar opacities (AO), AO associated with consolidation, consolidation and/or pleural effusion. We stratified patients in groups according to the time interval between symptoms onset (cut-off 5 days) and X-ray imaging and according to age (cut-off 60 years old). Computed tomography was performed in case of a discrepancy between clinical symptoms, laboratory and X-ray findings, and/or suspicion of complications. RESULTS: A total of 468 patients were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Lung lesions primarily manifested as interstitial opacities (71.7%) and AO opacities (60.5%), more frequently bilateral (64.5%) and with a peripheral predominance (62.5%). Patients admitted to the emergency radiology department after 5 days from symptoms onset, more frequently had interstitial and AO opacities, in comparison to those admitted within 5 days, and lung lesions were more frequently bilateral and peripheral. Older patients more frequently presented interstitial and AO opacities in comparison to younger ones. Sixty-eight patients underwent CT that principally showed the presence of ground-glass opacities and consolidations. CONCLUSIONS: The most common X-ray pattern is multifocal and peripheral, associated with interstitial and alveolar opacities. Chest X-ray, compared to CT, can be considered a reliable diagnostic tool, especially in the Emergency setting. Twit Text FOAVip Chest X-ray features of SARS-CoV-2 in the emergency department: a multicenter experience from northern Italian hospitals ????Respir Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32469732 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32469732 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32469732}}</ref> Chest X-ray features of SARS-CoV-2 in the emergency department: a multicenter experience from northern Italian hospitals #MMPMID32469732 Ippolito D; Maino C; Pecorelli A; Allegranza P; Cangiotti C; Capodaglio C; Mariani I; Giandola T; Gandola D; Bianco I; Ragusi M; Franzesi CT; Corso R; Sironi S Respir Med 2020[Aug]; 170 (ä): 106036 PMID32469732show ga OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the imaging features of routine admission chest X-ray in patients referred for novel Coronavirus 2019 infection. METHODS: All patients referred to the emergency departments, RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection were evaluated. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. Two radiologists (8 and 15 years of experience) reviewed all the X-ray images and evaluated the following findings: interstitial opacities, alveolar opacities (AO), AO associated with consolidation, consolidation and/or pleural effusion. We stratified patients in groups according to the time interval between symptoms onset (cut-off 5 days) and X-ray imaging and according to age (cut-off 60 years old). Computed tomography was performed in case of a discrepancy between clinical symptoms, laboratory and X-ray findings, and/or suspicion of complications. RESULTS: A total of 468 patients were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Lung lesions primarily manifested as interstitial opacities (71.7%) and AO opacities (60.5%), more frequently bilateral (64.5%) and with a peripheral predominance (62.5%). Patients admitted to the emergency radiology department after 5 days from symptoms onset, more frequently had interstitial and AO opacities, in comparison to those admitted within 5 days, and lung lesions were more frequently bilateral and peripheral. Older patients more frequently presented interstitial and AO opacities in comparison to younger ones. Sixty-eight patients underwent CT that principally showed the presence of ground-glass opacities and consolidations. CONCLUSIONS: The most common X-ray pattern is multifocal and peripheral, associated with interstitial and alveolar opacities. Chest X-ray, compared to CT, can be considered a reliable diagnostic tool, especially in the Emergency setting. |*Coronavirus Infections/complications/diagnosis/epidemiology[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |*Pleural Effusion/diagnostic imaging/etiology[MESH] |*Pneumonia, Viral/complications/diagnosis/diagnostic imaging/epidemiology/etiology[MESH] |*Radiography, Thoracic/methods/statistics & numerical data[MESH] |*Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods/statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing[MESH] |Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods[MESH] |Comparative Effectiveness Research[MESH] |Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Italy/epidemiology[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Reproducibility of Results[MESH]Chest X-ray features of SARS-CoV-2 in the emergency department: a mult(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing