Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s11739-020-02382-4 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s11739-020-02382-4 32468509!7255970!32468509     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Intern+Emerg+Med 2020 ; 15 (5): 773-777 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32468509|t=2020. Providing evidence on the ongoing health care workers mask debate |pdf=|usr=}}{{32468509}} gab.com Text Providing evidence on the ongoing health care workers mask debate JO: Intern Emerg Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32468509 #FOAvip The scarcity of facemasks, particularly N95 respirators, combined with the lack of solid data to address the suitability of each mask type for adequate health care worker (HCW) protection have caused turmoil among HCWs. Current recommendations suggest mask usage solely during HCW contact with Covid-19 patients, namely plain medical mask for low-risk contacts and N95 for aerosol generating procedures. The distinction regarding the escalation of mask complexity depending on contact type is nevertheless based on plausible theoretical assumptions rather than hard evidence of a clear benefit. Conversely, we suggest that at least a plain mask should be used during all HCWs' contacts in healthcare facilities which constitute a highly probable but often overlooked means of SARS-CoV-2 transmission among HCWs. Twit Text FOAVip Providing evidence on the ongoing health care workers mask debate ????Intern Emerg Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32468509 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32468509 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32468509}}</ref> Providing evidence on the ongoing health care workers mask debate #MMPMID32468509 Tsilingiris D; Papatheodoridi M; Kapelios CJ Intern Emerg Med 2020[Aug]; 15 (5): 773-777 PMID32468509show ga The scarcity of facemasks, particularly N95 respirators, combined with the lack of solid data to address the suitability of each mask type for adequate health care worker (HCW) protection have caused turmoil among HCWs. Current recommendations suggest mask usage solely during HCW contact with Covid-19 patients, namely plain medical mask for low-risk contacts and N95 for aerosol generating procedures. The distinction regarding the escalation of mask complexity depending on contact type is nevertheless based on plausible theoretical assumptions rather than hard evidence of a clear benefit. Conversely, we suggest that at least a plain mask should be used during all HCWs' contacts in healthcare facilities which constitute a highly probable but often overlooked means of SARS-CoV-2 transmission among HCWs. |*Health Personnel[MESH] |Aerosols[MESH] |Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology/*prevention & control/*transmission[MESH] |Cross Infection/epidemiology/*prevention & control/*transmission[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/*prevention & control[MESH] |Masks/*supply & distribution[MESH] |Occupational Health[MESH] |Pandemics/*prevention & control[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology/*prevention & control/*transmission[MESH]Providing evidence on the ongoing health care workers mask debate (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing