Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.024 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.024 32464320!7247512!32464320     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32464320&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       J+Clin+Epidemiol 2020 ; 125 (?): 179-182 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32464320|t=2020. "One more time": why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant to COVID-19 makes sense |pdf=|usr=}}{{32464320}} gab.com Text "One more time": why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant to COVID-19 makes sense JO: J Clin Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32464320 #FOAvip * Given the urgent need for credible answers to high-priority questions about the health and social impacts of COVID-19, many systematic reviewers seek to contribute their skills and expertise. * Rather than embarking on unnecessary, duplicate reviews, we encourage the evidence synthesis community to prioritise purposeful replication of systematic reviews of evidence relevant to COVID-19. * We explain why replication of systematic reviews is important, how to carry out a replication, and when to consider replication of reviews. Twit Text FOAVip "One more time": why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant to COVID-19 makes sense ????J Clin Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32464320 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32464320 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32464320}}</ref> "One more time": why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant to COVID-19 makes sense #MMPMID32464320 Page MJ; Welch VA; Haddaway NR; Karunananthan S; Maxwell LJ; Tugwell P J Clin Epidemiol 2020[Sep]; 125 (?): 179-182 PMID32464320show ga * Given the urgent need for credible answers to high-priority questions about the health and social impacts of COVID-19, many systematic reviewers seek to contribute their skills and expertise. * Rather than embarking on unnecessary, duplicate reviews, we encourage the evidence synthesis community to prioritise purposeful replication of systematic reviews of evidence relevant to COVID-19. * We explain why replication of systematic reviews is important, how to carry out a replication, and when to consider replication of reviews. |*Systematic Reviews as Topic[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*epidemiology[MESH]"One more time": why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant t(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing