Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1007/s00330-020-06956-w

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s00330-020-06956-w
suck pdf from google scholar
32462445!7253230!32462445
unlimited free pdf from europmc32462445    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid32462445      Eur+Radiol 2020 ; 30 (11): 6221-6227
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Any unique image biomarkers associated with COVID-19? #MMPMID32462445
  • Pu J; Leader J; Bandos A; Shi J; Du P; Yu J; Yang B; Ke S; Guo Y; Field JB; Fuhrman C; Wilson D; Sciurba F; Jin C
  • Eur Radiol 2020[Nov]; 30 (11): 6221-6227 PMID32462445show ga
  • OBJECTIVE: To define the uniqueness of chest CT infiltrative features associated with COVID-19 image characteristics as potential diagnostic biomarkers. METHODS: We retrospectively collected chest CT exams including n = 498 on 151 unique patients RT-PCR positive for COVID-19 and n = 497 unique patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Both COVID-19 and CAP image sets were partitioned into three groups for training, validation, and testing respectively. In an attempt to discriminate COVID-19 from CAP, we developed several classifiers based on three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We also asked two experienced radiologists to visually interpret the testing set and discriminate COVID-19 from CAP. The classification performance of the computer algorithms and the radiologists was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the nonparametric approaches with multiplicity adjustments when necessary. RESULTS: One of the considered models showed non-trivial, but moderate diagnostic ability overall (AUC of 0.70 with 99% CI 0.56-0.85). This model allowed for the identification of 8-50% of CAP patients with only 2% of COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Professional or automated interpretation of CT exams has a moderately low ability to distinguish between COVID-19 and CAP cases. However, the automated image analysis is promising for targeted decision-making due to being able to accurately identify a sizable subsect of non-COVID-19 cases. KEY POINTS: * Both human experts and artificial intelligent models were used to classify the CT scans. * ROC analysis and the nonparametric approaches were used to analyze the performance of the radiologists and computer algorithms. * Unique image features or patterns may not exist for reliably distinguishing all COVID-19 from CAP; however, there may be imaging markers that can identify a sizable subset of non-COVID-19 cases.
  • |*Betacoronavirus[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Artificial Intelligence[MESH]
  • |Biomarkers[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Coronavirus Infections/*diagnostic imaging[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/*methods[MESH]
  • |Lung/diagnostic imaging[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/*diagnostic imaging[MESH]
  • |ROC Curve[MESH]
  • |Radiography, Thoracic/methods[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box