Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1080/15265161.2020.1764142 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1080/15265161.2020.1764142 32427528!ä!32427528 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Am+J+Bioeth 2020 ; 20 (7): 55-61 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32427528|t=2020. Vexing, Veiled, and Inequitable: Social Distancing and the "Rights" Divide in the Age of COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{32427528}} gab.com Text Vexing, Veiled, and Inequitable: Social Distancing and the "Rights" Divide in the Age of COVID-19 JO: Am J Bioeth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32427528 #FOAvip Although unprecedented in scope and beyond all our life experiences, sweeping social distancing measures are not without historical precedent. Historically, racism, stigma, and discrimination resulted in grossly inequitable application of disease containment measures. But history also provides examples in which broad measures enjoyed remarkable public support. When it comes to COVID-19, blame and division continue to shape containment responses. But the COVID-19 pandemic also resonates with moments in which there was broad social support for containment precisely because lockdowns or stay at home orders are, on the surface, remarkably equitable. Yet even in a context in which a majority of Americans support social distancing, small but coordinated conservative groups are challenging social distancing as a matter of individual rights. In sharp contrast, vulnerable populations, who bear the heaviest burden of disease, have claimed a right to social distancing as a matter of protection. Twit Text FOAVip Vexing, Veiled, and Inequitable: Social Distancing and the "Rights" Divide in the Age of COVID-19 ????Am J Bioeth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32427528 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32427528 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32427528}}</ref> Vexing, Veiled, and Inequitable: Social Distancing and the "Rights" Divide in the Age of COVID-19 #MMPMID32427528 Fairchild A; Gostin L; Bayer R Am J Bioeth 2020[Jul]; 20 (7): 55-61 PMID32427528show ga Although unprecedented in scope and beyond all our life experiences, sweeping social distancing measures are not without historical precedent. Historically, racism, stigma, and discrimination resulted in grossly inequitable application of disease containment measures. But history also provides examples in which broad measures enjoyed remarkable public support. When it comes to COVID-19, blame and division continue to shape containment responses. But the COVID-19 pandemic also resonates with moments in which there was broad social support for containment precisely because lockdowns or stay at home orders are, on the surface, remarkably equitable. Yet even in a context in which a majority of Americans support social distancing, small but coordinated conservative groups are challenging social distancing as a matter of individual rights. In sharp contrast, vulnerable populations, who bear the heaviest burden of disease, have claimed a right to social distancing as a matter of protection. |*Betacoronavirus[MESH] |*Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |COVID-19/prevention & control[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology/prevention & control[MESH] |Human Rights[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics/ethics/prevention & control[MESH] |Physical Distancing[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*epidemiology/prevention & control[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Vexing, Veiled, and Inequitable: Social Distancing and the "Rights" Di(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing