Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s41649-020-00118-2 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s41649-020-00118-2 32427202!7229875!32427202     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Asian+Bioeth+Rev 2020 ; 12 (2): 235-242 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32427202|t=2020. COVID-19 Super-spreaders: Definitional Quandaries and Implications |pdf=|usr=}}{{32427202}} gab.com Text COVID-19 Super-spreaders: Definitional Quandaries and Implications JO: Asian Bioeth Rev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32427202 #FOAvip Uncertainty around the role 'super-spreaders' play in the transmission and escalation of infectious disease is compounded by its broad and vague definition. It is a term that has been much used in relation to COVID-19, particularly in social media. On its widest definition, it refers to a propensity to infect a larger than average number of people. Given the biological, behavioural and environmental variables relevant to infectivity, this might be pertinent to almost any infected individual who is not physically isolated from others. Nor is the term confined to individuals with a propensity to spread infectious disease: it can potentially be used to describe events, policies or settings. This article explores the use of the term and considers circumstances in which the wide definition can be problematic. One problem is that it can lead to undeserved apportionment of moral blame to alleged super-spreaders. Another is that it can detract from scientific investigation of the heterogeneity of COVID-19 transmission. The author calls for a clearer epidemiological definition. Twit Text FOAVip COVID-19 Super-spreaders: Definitional Quandaries and Implications ????Asian Bioeth Rev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32427202 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32427202 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32427202}}</ref> COVID-19 Super-spreaders: Definitional Quandaries and Implications #MMPMID32427202 Cave E Asian Bioeth Rev 2020[Jun]; 12 (2): 235-242 PMID32427202show ga Uncertainty around the role 'super-spreaders' play in the transmission and escalation of infectious disease is compounded by its broad and vague definition. It is a term that has been much used in relation to COVID-19, particularly in social media. On its widest definition, it refers to a propensity to infect a larger than average number of people. Given the biological, behavioural and environmental variables relevant to infectivity, this might be pertinent to almost any infected individual who is not physically isolated from others. Nor is the term confined to individuals with a propensity to spread infectious disease: it can potentially be used to describe events, policies or settings. This article explores the use of the term and considers circumstances in which the wide definition can be problematic. One problem is that it can lead to undeserved apportionment of moral blame to alleged super-spreaders. Another is that it can detract from scientific investigation of the heterogeneity of COVID-19 transmission. The author calls for a clearer epidemiological definition. äCOVID-19 Super-spreaders: Definitional Quandaries and Implications (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing