Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1080/15265161.2020.1764141 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1080/15265161.2020.1764141 32420822!7387214!32420822     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Am+J+Bioeth 2020 ; 20 (7): 28-36 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32420822|t=2020. Eliminating Categorical Exclusion Criteria in Crisis Standards of Care Frameworks |pdf=|usr=}}{{32420822}} gab.com Text Eliminating Categorical Exclusion Criteria in Crisis Standards of Care Frameworks JO: Am J Bioeth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32420822 #FOAvip During public health crises including the COVID-19 pandemic, resource scarcity and contagion risks may require health systems to shift-to some degree-from a usual clinical ethic, focused on the well-being of individual patients, to a public health ethic, focused on population health. Many triage policies exist that fall under the legal protections afforded by "crisis standards of care," but they have key differences. We critically appraise one of the most fundamental differences among policies, namely the use of criteria to categorically exclude certain patients from eligibility for otherwise standard medical services. We examine these categorical exclusion criteria from ethical, legal, disability, and implementation perspectives. Focusing our analysis on the most common type of exclusion criteria, which are disease-specific, we conclude that optimal policies for critical care resource allocation and the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should not use categorical exclusions. We argue that the avoidance of categorical exclusions is often practically feasible, consistent with public health norms, and mitigates discrimination against persons with disabilities. Twit Text FOAVip Eliminating Categorical Exclusion Criteria in Crisis Standards of Care Frameworks ????Am J Bioeth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32420822 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32420822 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32420822}}</ref> Eliminating Categorical Exclusion Criteria in Crisis Standards of Care Frameworks #MMPMID32420822 Auriemma CL; Molinero AM; Houtrow AJ; Persad G; White DB; Halpern SD Am J Bioeth 2020[Jul]; 20 (7): 28-36 PMID32420822show ga During public health crises including the COVID-19 pandemic, resource scarcity and contagion risks may require health systems to shift-to some degree-from a usual clinical ethic, focused on the well-being of individual patients, to a public health ethic, focused on population health. Many triage policies exist that fall under the legal protections afforded by "crisis standards of care," but they have key differences. We critically appraise one of the most fundamental differences among policies, namely the use of criteria to categorically exclude certain patients from eligibility for otherwise standard medical services. We examine these categorical exclusion criteria from ethical, legal, disability, and implementation perspectives. Focusing our analysis on the most common type of exclusion criteria, which are disease-specific, we conclude that optimal policies for critical care resource allocation and the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should not use categorical exclusions. We argue that the avoidance of categorical exclusions is often practically feasible, consistent with public health norms, and mitigates discrimination against persons with disabilities. |*Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*epidemiology/prevention & control[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics/ethics/prevention & control[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*epidemiology/prevention & control[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Standard of Care/*ethics[MESH] |Triage/*ethics[MESH]Eliminating Categorical Exclusion Criteria in Crisis Standards of Care(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing