Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/cod.13601 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/cod.13601 32406064!7272965!32406064     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Contact+Dermatitis 2020 ; 83 (2): 115-121 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32406064|t=2020. Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks |pdf=|usr=}}{{32406064}} gab.com Text Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks JO: Contact Dermatitis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32406064 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, cases of adverse skin reactions related to the wearing of masks have been observed. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the short-term effects of N95 respirators and medical masks, respectively, on skin physiological properties and to report adverse skin reactions caused by the protective equipment. METHODS: This study used a randomized crossover design with repeated measurements. Twenty healthy Chinese volunteers were recruited. Skin parameters were measured on areas covered by the respective masks and on uncovered skin 2 and 4 hours after donning, and 0.5 and 1 hour after removing the masks, including skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), erythema, pH, and sebum secretion. Adverse reactions were clinically assessed, and perceived discomfort and non-compliance measured. RESULTS: Skin hydration, TEWL, and pH increased significantly with wearing the protective equipment. Erythema values increased from baseline. Sebum secretion increased both on the covered and uncovered skin with equipment-wearing. There was no significant difference in physiological values between the two types of equipment. More adverse reactions were reported following a N95 mask use than the use of a medical mask, with a higher score of discomfort and non-compliance. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that skin biophysical characters change as a result of wearing a mask or respirator. N95 respirators were associated with more skin reactions than medical masks. Twit Text FOAVip Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks ????Contact Dermatitis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32406064 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32406064 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32406064}}</ref> Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks #MMPMID32406064 Hua W; Zuo Y; Wan R; Xiong L; Tang J; Zou L; Shu X; Li L Contact Dermatitis 2020[Aug]; 83 (2): 115-121 PMID32406064show ga BACKGROUND: In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, cases of adverse skin reactions related to the wearing of masks have been observed. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the short-term effects of N95 respirators and medical masks, respectively, on skin physiological properties and to report adverse skin reactions caused by the protective equipment. METHODS: This study used a randomized crossover design with repeated measurements. Twenty healthy Chinese volunteers were recruited. Skin parameters were measured on areas covered by the respective masks and on uncovered skin 2 and 4 hours after donning, and 0.5 and 1 hour after removing the masks, including skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), erythema, pH, and sebum secretion. Adverse reactions were clinically assessed, and perceived discomfort and non-compliance measured. RESULTS: Skin hydration, TEWL, and pH increased significantly with wearing the protective equipment. Erythema values increased from baseline. Sebum secretion increased both on the covered and uncovered skin with equipment-wearing. There was no significant difference in physiological values between the two types of equipment. More adverse reactions were reported following a N95 mask use than the use of a medical mask, with a higher score of discomfort and non-compliance. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that skin biophysical characters change as a result of wearing a mask or respirator. N95 respirators were associated with more skin reactions than medical masks. |*Coronavirus Infections[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |*Pneumonia, Viral[MESH] |*Skin[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Erythema/*etiology[MESH] |Facial Dermatoses/*etiology[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Healthy Volunteers[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Hydrogen-Ion Concentration[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Masks/*adverse effects[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Pain/*etiology[MESH] |Pruritus/*etiology[MESH] |Respiratory Protective Devices/*adverse effects[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Sebum[MESH]Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing