Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/jmv.26005 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/jmv.26005 32401343!7272832!32401343     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32401343&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       J+Med+Virol 2020 ; 92 (10): 2193-2199 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32401343|t=2020. Evaluating the efficiency of specimen pooling for PCR-based detection of COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{32401343}} gab.com Text Evaluating the efficiency of specimen pooling for PCR-based detection of COVID-19 JO: J Med Virol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32401343 #FOAvip In the age of a pandemic, such as the ongoing one caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the world faces a limited supply of tests, personal protective equipment, and factories and supply chains are struggling to meet the growing demands. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of specimen pooling for testing of SARS-CoV-2 virus, to determine whether costs and resource savings could be achieved without impacting the sensitivity of the testing. Ten previously tested nasopharyngeal and throat swab specimens by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were pooled for testing, containing either one or two known positive specimens of varying viral concentrations. Specimen pooling did not affect the sensitivity of detecting SARS-CoV-2 when the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) of original specimen was lower than 35. In specimens with low viral load (Ct > 35), 2 of 15 pools (13.3%) were false negative. Pooling specimens to test for Coronavirus Disease 2019 infection in low prevalence (</=1%) areas or in low risk populations can dramatically decrease the resource burden on laboratory operations by up to 80%. This paves the way for large-scale population screening, allowing for assured policy decisions by governmental bodies to ease lockdown restrictions in areas with a low incidence of infection, or with lower-risk populations. Twit Text FOAVip Evaluating the efficiency of specimen pooling for PCR-based detection of COVID-19 ????J Med Virol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32401343 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32401343 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32401343}}</ref> Evaluating the efficiency of specimen pooling for PCR-based detection of COVID-19 #MMPMID32401343 Wacharapluesadee S; Kaewpom T; Ampoot W; Ghai S; Khamhang W; Worachotsueptrakun K; Wanthong P; Nopvichai C; Supharatpariyakorn T; Putcharoen O; Paitoonpong L; Suwanpimolkul G; Jantarabenjakul W; Hemachudha P; Krichphiphat A; Buathong R; Plipat T; Hemachudha T J Med Virol 2020[Oct]; 92 (10): 2193-2199 PMID32401343show ga In the age of a pandemic, such as the ongoing one caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the world faces a limited supply of tests, personal protective equipment, and factories and supply chains are struggling to meet the growing demands. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of specimen pooling for testing of SARS-CoV-2 virus, to determine whether costs and resource savings could be achieved without impacting the sensitivity of the testing. Ten previously tested nasopharyngeal and throat swab specimens by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were pooled for testing, containing either one or two known positive specimens of varying viral concentrations. Specimen pooling did not affect the sensitivity of detecting SARS-CoV-2 when the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) of original specimen was lower than 35. In specimens with low viral load (Ct > 35), 2 of 15 pools (13.3%) were false negative. Pooling specimens to test for Coronavirus Disease 2019 infection in low prevalence ( |*Pandemics[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing/economics/*methods[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis/economics/*epidemiology/virology[MESH] |Disease Notification/economics/methods[MESH] |Epidemiological Monitoring[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Limit of Detection[MESH] |Nasopharynx/virology[MESH] |Pharynx/virology[MESH] |Prevalence[MESH] |RNA, Viral/genetics[MESH] |Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/economics/*methods[MESH] |Retrospective Studies[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2/*genetics[MESH] |Specimen Handling/economics/*methods[MESH] |Thailand/epidemiology[MESH]Evaluating the efficiency of specimen pooling for PCR-based detection (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing