Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.04.017 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.04.017 32387041!7188637!32387041     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Arch+Med+Res 2020 ; 51 (6): 572-573 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32387041|t=2020. COVID-19 and Moral Imperialism in Multinational Clinical Research |pdf=|usr=}}{{32387041}} gab.com Text COVID-19 and Moral Imperialism in Multinational Clinical Research JO: Arch Med Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32387041 #FOAvip A TV debate in April 2020 between two French doctors regarding the benefits of testing a coronavirus vaccine in Africa where there are no masks or treatments available has led to international criticism. This case highlights a problematic ethical double standard in multinational clinical research: trials that would be considered unethical in high income countries (e.g., placebo-controlled where there is an existing treatment) are nonetheless justified in low-and-middle-income countries because the existing standards of care are less (i.e., no access to a treatment). Underlying this ethical double standard in some multinational clinical trials is a moral imperialism and persistent colonialist thinking that must be rejected. Twit Text FOAVip COVID-19 and Moral Imperialism in Multinational Clinical Research ????Arch Med Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32387041 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32387041 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32387041}}</ref> COVID-19 and Moral Imperialism in Multinational Clinical Research #MMPMID32387041 Hellmann F; Williams-Jones B; Garrafa V Arch Med Res 2020[Aug]; 51 (6): 572-573 PMID32387041show ga A TV debate in April 2020 between two French doctors regarding the benefits of testing a coronavirus vaccine in Africa where there are no masks or treatments available has led to international criticism. This case highlights a problematic ethical double standard in multinational clinical research: trials that would be considered unethical in high income countries (e.g., placebo-controlled where there is an existing treatment) are nonetheless justified in low-and-middle-income countries because the existing standards of care are less (i.e., no access to a treatment). Underlying this ethical double standard in some multinational clinical trials is a moral imperialism and persistent colonialist thinking that must be rejected. |*Ethics, Research[MESH] |Africa[MESH] |Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |COVID-19 Vaccines[MESH] |Clinical Trials as Topic/*ethics[MESH] |Colonialism[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*diagnosis/*prevention & control[MESH] |Developing Countries[MESH] |Ethical Relativism[MESH] |France[MESH] |Human Experimentation/ethics[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Moral Obligations[MESH] |Pandemics/*prevention & control[MESH] |Personal Protective Equipment[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*diagnosis/*prevention & control[MESH] |Research Subjects[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]COVID-19 and Moral Imperialism in Multinational Clinical Research (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing