Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s10393-020-01479-8 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10393-020-01479-8 32350634!7189354!32350634     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32350634&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Ecohealth 2020 ; 17 (2): 217-221 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32350634|t=2020. Catastrophic Risk: Waking Up to the Reality of a Pandemic?|pdf=|usr=}}{{32350634}} gab.com Text Catastrophic Risk: Waking Up to the Reality of a Pandemic JO: Ecohealth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32350634 #FOAvip Will a major shock awaken the US citizens to the threat of catastrophic pandemic risk? Using a natural experiment administered both before and after the 2014 West African Ebola Outbreak, our evidence suggests "no." Our results show that prior to the Ebola scare, the US citizens were relatively complacent and placed a low relative priority on public spending to prepare for a pandemic disease outbreak relative to an environmental disaster risk (e.g., Fukushima) or a terrorist attack (e.g., 9/11). After the Ebola scare, the average citizen did not over-react to the risk. This flat reaction was unexpected given the well-known availability heuristic-people tend to over-weigh judgments of events more heavily toward more recent information. In contrast, the average citizen continued to value pandemic risk less relative to terrorism or environmental risk. Twit Text FOAVip Catastrophic Risk: Waking Up to the Reality of a Pandemic ????Ecohealth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32350634 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32350634 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32350634}}</ref> Catastrophic Risk: Waking Up to the Reality of a Pandemic? #MMPMID32350634 Pike J; Shogren JF; Aadland D; Viscusi WK; Finnoff D; Skiba A; Daszak P Ecohealth 2020[Jun]; 17 (2): 217-221 PMID32350634show ga Will a major shock awaken the US citizens to the threat of catastrophic pandemic risk? Using a natural experiment administered both before and after the 2014 West African Ebola Outbreak, our evidence suggests "no." Our results show that prior to the Ebola scare, the US citizens were relatively complacent and placed a low relative priority on public spending to prepare for a pandemic disease outbreak relative to an environmental disaster risk (e.g., Fukushima) or a terrorist attack (e.g., 9/11). After the Ebola scare, the average citizen did not over-react to the risk. This flat reaction was unexpected given the well-known availability heuristic-people tend to over-weigh judgments of events more heavily toward more recent information. In contrast, the average citizen continued to value pandemic risk less relative to terrorism or environmental risk. |*Disease Outbreaks[MESH] |Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Catastrophic Risk: Waking Up to the Reality of a Pandemic?(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing