Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s40617-020-00430-1 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s40617-020-00430-1 32328220!7178923!32328220     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Behav+Anal+Pract 2020 ; 13 (2): 299-305 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32328220|t=2020. A Proposed Process for Risk Mitigation During the COVID-19 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{32328220}} gab.com Text A Proposed Process for Risk Mitigation During the COVID-19 Pandemic JO: Behav Anal Pract http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32328220 #FOAvip Recent executive orders have led some applied behavior analysis (ABA) providers to interpret themselves as "essential personnel" during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, we argue against a blanket interpretation that being labeled "essential personnel" means that all in-person ABA services for all clients should continue during the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe this argument holds even if ABA providers are not in a jurisdiction currently under an active shelter-at-home or related order. First, we provide a brief description of risks associated with continued in-person ABA service delivery, as well as risks associated with the temporary suspension of services or the transition to remote ABA service delivery. For many clients, continued in-person service delivery carries a significant risk of severe harm to the client, family and caregivers, staff, and a currently overburdened health care system. In these situations, ABA providers should temporarily suspend services or transition to telehealth or other forms of remote service delivery until information from federal, state, and local health care experts deems in-person contact safe. In rare cases, temporary suspension of services or a transition to remote service delivery may place the client or others at risk of significant harm. In these situations, in-person services should likely continue, and ongoing assessment and risk mitigation are essential. Twit Text FOAVip A Proposed Process for Risk Mitigation During the COVID-19 Pandemic ????Behav Anal Pract http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32328220 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32328220 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32328220}}</ref> A Proposed Process for Risk Mitigation During the COVID-19 Pandemic #MMPMID32328220 Cox DJ; Plavnick JB; Brodhead MT Behav Anal Pract 2020[Jun]; 13 (2): 299-305 PMID32328220show ga Recent executive orders have led some applied behavior analysis (ABA) providers to interpret themselves as "essential personnel" during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, we argue against a blanket interpretation that being labeled "essential personnel" means that all in-person ABA services for all clients should continue during the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe this argument holds even if ABA providers are not in a jurisdiction currently under an active shelter-at-home or related order. First, we provide a brief description of risks associated with continued in-person ABA service delivery, as well as risks associated with the temporary suspension of services or the transition to remote ABA service delivery. For many clients, continued in-person service delivery carries a significant risk of severe harm to the client, family and caregivers, staff, and a currently overburdened health care system. In these situations, ABA providers should temporarily suspend services or transition to telehealth or other forms of remote service delivery until information from federal, state, and local health care experts deems in-person contact safe. In rare cases, temporary suspension of services or a transition to remote service delivery may place the client or others at risk of significant harm. In these situations, in-person services should likely continue, and ongoing assessment and risk mitigation are essential. äA Proposed Process for Risk Mitigation During the COVID-19 Pandemic (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing