Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47370 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47370 32302278!7234686!32302278     free     free     free       West+J+Emerg+Med 2020 ; 21 (3): 470-472 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32302278|t=2020. The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{32302278}} gab.com Text The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19 JO: West J Emerg Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32302278 #FOAvip Many public officials are calling for increased testing for the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and some governments have taken extraordinary measures to increase the availability of testing. However, little has been published about the sensitivity and specificity of the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs that are commonly used for testing. This narrative review evaluates the literature regarding the accuracy of these tests, and makes recommendations based on this literature. In brief, a negative RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab test is insufficient to rule out COVID-19. Thus, over-reliance on the results of the test may be dangerous, and the push for widespread testing may be overstated. Twit Text FOAVip The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19 ????West J Emerg Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32302278 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32302278 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32302278}}</ref> The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19 #MMPMID32302278 Zitek T West J Emerg Med 2020[Apr]; 21 (3): 470-472 PMID32302278show ga Many public officials are calling for increased testing for the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and some governments have taken extraordinary measures to increase the availability of testing. However, little has been published about the sensitivity and specificity of the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs that are commonly used for testing. This narrative review evaluates the literature regarding the accuracy of these tests, and makes recommendations based on this literature. In brief, a negative RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab test is insufficient to rule out COVID-19. Thus, over-reliance on the results of the test may be dangerous, and the push for widespread testing may be overstated. |*Betacoronavirus/genetics/isolation & purification[MESH] |*Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing[MESH] |Clinical Laboratory Techniques/*standards[MESH] |Coronavirus[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*diagnosis[MESH] |Diagnostic Tests, Routine[MESH] |False Negative Reactions[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Nasal Cavity[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*diagnosis[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19 (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing