Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1002/alr.22587

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/alr.22587
suck pdf from google scholar
32301284!7262123!32301284
unlimited free pdf from europmc32301284    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32301284      Int+Forum+Allergy+Rhinol 2020 ; 10 (8): 944-950
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Smell dysfunction: a biomarker for COVID-19 #MMPMID32301284
  • Moein ST; Hashemian SM; Mansourafshar B; Khorram-Tousi A; Tabarsi P; Doty RL
  • Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020[Aug]; 10 (8): 944-950 PMID32301284show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is responsible for the largest pandemic since the 1918 influenza A virus subtype H1N1 influenza outbreak. The symptoms presently recognized by the World Health Organization are cough, fever, tiredness, and difficulty breathing. Patient-reported smell and taste loss has been associated with COVID-19 infection, yet no empirical olfactory testing on a cohort of COVID-19 patients has been performed. METHODS: The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), a well-validated 40-odorant test, was administered to 60 confirmed COVID-19 inpatients and 60 age- and sex-matched controls to assess the magnitude and frequency of their olfactory dysfunction. A mixed effects analysis of variance determined whether meaningful differences in test scores existed between the 2 groups and if the test scores were differentially influenced by sex. RESULTS: Fifty-nine (98%) of the 60 patients exhibited some smell dysfunction (mean [95% CI] UPSIT score: 20.98 [19.47, 22.48]; controls: 34.10 [33.31, 34.88]; p < 0.0001). Thirty-five of the 60 patients (58%) were either anosmic (15/60; 25%) or severely microsmic (20/60; 33%); 16 exhibited moderate microsmia (16/60; 27%), 8 mild microsmia (8/60; 13%), and 1 normosmia (1/60; 2%). Deficits were evident for all 40 UPSIT odorants. No meaningful relationships between the test scores and sex, disease severity, or comorbidities were found. CONCLUSION: Quantitative smell testing demonstrates that decreased smell function, but not always anosmia, is a major marker for SARS-CoV-2 infection and suggests the possibility that smell testing may help, in some cases, to identify COVID-19 patients in need of early treatment or quarantine.
  • |*Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis/epidemiology/physiopathology[MESH]
  • |*Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis/etiology[MESH]
  • |*Pandemics[MESH]
  • |*Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis/epidemiology/physiopathology[MESH]
  • |*Rhinitis/diagnosis/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |*Sino-Nasal Outcome Test[MESH]
  • |*Sinusitis/diagnosis/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Betacoronavirus/*isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Chronic Disease[MESH]
  • |Differential Threshold[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Odorants[MESH]
  • |Olfactory Perception[MESH]
  • |Pennsylvania/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Reproducibility of Results[MESH]
  • |Risk Factors[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box