Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.060 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.060 32283143!7195393!32283143     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Infect 2020 ; 81 (1): e21-e23 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32283143|t=2020. Arbidol monotherapy is superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{32283143}} gab.com Text Arbidol monotherapy is superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19 JO: J Infect http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32283143 #FOAvip Lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol have been previously used to treat acute respiratory syndrome- coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in clinical practice; nevertheless, their effectiveness remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral effects and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in patients with the 2019-nCoV disease (COVID-19). Fifty patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were divided into two groups: including lopinavir/ritonavir group (34 cases) and arbidol group (16 cases). Lopinavir/ritonavir group received 400 mg/100mg of Lopinavir/ritonavir, twice a day for a week, while the arbidol group was given 0.2 g arbidol, three times a day. Data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The cycle threshold values of open reading frame 1ab and nucleocapsid genes by RT-PCR assay were monitored during antiviral therapy. None of the patients developed severe pneumonia or ARDS. There was no difference in fever duration between the two groups (P=0.61). On day 14 after the admission, no viral load was detected in arbidol group, but the viral load was found in 15(44.1%) patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Patients in the arbidol group had a shorter duration of positive RNA test compared to those in the lopinavir/ritonavir group (P<0.01). Moreover, no apparent side effects were found in both groups. In conclusion, our data indicate that arbidol monotherapy may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19. Twit Text FOAVip Arbidol monotherapy is superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19 ????J Infect http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32283143 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32283143 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32283143}}</ref> Arbidol monotherapy is superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19 #MMPMID32283143 Zhu Z; Lu Z; Xu T; Chen C; Yang G; Zha T; Lu J; Xue Y J Infect 2020[Jul]; 81 (1): e21-e23 PMID32283143show ga Lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol have been previously used to treat acute respiratory syndrome- coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in clinical practice; nevertheless, their effectiveness remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral effects and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in patients with the 2019-nCoV disease (COVID-19). Fifty patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were divided into two groups: including lopinavir/ritonavir group (34 cases) and arbidol group (16 cases). Lopinavir/ritonavir group received 400 mg/100mg of Lopinavir/ritonavir, twice a day for a week, while the arbidol group was given 0.2 g arbidol, three times a day. Data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The cycle threshold values of open reading frame 1ab and nucleocapsid genes by RT-PCR assay were monitored during antiviral therapy. None of the patients developed severe pneumonia or ARDS. There was no difference in fever duration between the two groups (P=0.61). On day 14 after the admission, no viral load was detected in arbidol group, but the viral load was found in 15(44.1%) patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Patients in the arbidol group had a shorter duration of positive RNA test compared to those in the lopinavir/ritonavir group (P<0.01). Moreover, no apparent side effects were found in both groups. In conclusion, our data indicate that arbidol monotherapy may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19. |*Betacoronavirus[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*drug therapy/virology[MESH] |Drug Combinations[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Indoles/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use[MESH] |Lopinavir/adverse effects/*therapeutic use[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*drug therapy/virology[MESH] |Retrospective Studies[MESH] |Ritonavir/adverse effects/*therapeutic use[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Arbidol monotherapy is superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COV(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing