Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1055/a-1146-1160 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1055/a-1146-1160 32236913!7295273!32236913     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Dtsch+Med+Wochenschr 2020 ; 145 (10): 687-692 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32236913|t=2020. Rechtsfragen der Ressourcenzuteilung in der COVID-19-Pandemie - Zwischen Utilitarismus und Lebenswertindifferenz |pdf=|usr=}}{{32236913}} gab.com Text Rechtsfragen der Ressourcenzuteilung in der COVID-19-Pandemie - Zwischen Utilitarismus und Lebenswertindifferenz JO: Dtsch Med Wochenschr http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32236913 #FOAvip The COVID-19 pandemic poses unprecedented challenges for the German health care system. What is already the case in some other countries, may occur in Germany in the near future also: Faced with limited ICU resources, doctors will be forced to decide which patients to treat and which to let die. This paper examines the legal implications of such decisions. It takes up arguments from the general discussion on prioritization in medicine. A constitutional hurdle for the application of utilitarian criteria (in particular patients' age or social role) comes from the principle that every human life is of equal value and must not be traded off against others ("life value indifference"). However, the limits that the Grundgesetz (German Basic Law) sets for state actions do not apply directly to doctors. According to the Musterberufsordnung (professional code of conduct), doctors act based on their conscience and the requirements of medical ethics and humanity. The implications of this normative standard for the prioritizing in an exceptional situation as the COVID 19 pandemic have not been sufficiently clarified. This uncertainty leads to emotional and moral burdens for doctors. The authors conclude that the German law grants a limited freedom of choice that allows physicians to apply utilitarian criteria in addition to purely medical decision algorithms. Twit Text FOAVip Rechtsfragen der Ressourcenzuteilung in der COVID-19-Pandemie - Zwischen Utilitarismus und Lebenswertindifferenz ????Dtsch Med Wochenschr http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32236913 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32236913 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32236913}}</ref> Rechtsfragen der Ressourcenzuteilung in der COVID-19-Pandemie - Zwischen Utilitarismus und Lebenswertindifferenz #MMPMID32236913 Hubner J; Schewe DM; Katalinic A; Frielitz FS Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2020[May]; 145 (10): 687-692 PMID32236913show ga The COVID-19 pandemic poses unprecedented challenges for the German health care system. What is already the case in some other countries, may occur in Germany in the near future also: Faced with limited ICU resources, doctors will be forced to decide which patients to treat and which to let die. This paper examines the legal implications of such decisions. It takes up arguments from the general discussion on prioritization in medicine. A constitutional hurdle for the application of utilitarian criteria (in particular patients' age or social role) comes from the principle that every human life is of equal value and must not be traded off against others ("life value indifference"). However, the limits that the Grundgesetz (German Basic Law) sets for state actions do not apply directly to doctors. According to the Musterberufsordnung (professional code of conduct), doctors act based on their conscience and the requirements of medical ethics and humanity. The implications of this normative standard for the prioritizing in an exceptional situation as the COVID 19 pandemic have not been sufficiently clarified. This uncertainty leads to emotional and moral burdens for doctors. The authors conclude that the German law grants a limited freedom of choice that allows physicians to apply utilitarian criteria in addition to purely medical decision algorithms. |*Ethics, Medical[MESH] |Betacoronavirus[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |Coronavirus Infections/*mortality/therapy[MESH] |Cost of Illness[MESH] |Decision Making/*ethics[MESH] |Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence[MESH] |Germany[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Legislation, Medical[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Physicians/ethics/standards[MESH] |Pneumonia, Viral/*mortality/therapy[MESH] |Resource Allocation/*ethics/legislation & jurisprudence[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Rechtsfragen der Ressourcenzuteilung in der COVID-19-Pandemie - Zwisch(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing