Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


suck pdf from google scholar
unlimited free pdf from europmc32222812    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free
PDF vom PMID32222812  :  Publisher

suck abstract from ncbi

Nephropedia Template TP Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia

  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) #MMPMID32222812
  • Alhazzani W; Moller MH; Arabi YM; Loeb M; Gong MN; Fan E; Oczkowski S; Levy MM; Derde L; Dzierba A; Du B; Aboodi M; Wunsch H; Cecconi M; Koh Y; Chertow DS; Maitland K; Alshamsi F; Belley-Cote E; Greco M; Laundy M; Morgan JS; Kesecioglu J; McGeer A; Mermel L; Mammen MJ; Alexander PE; Arrington A; Centofanti JE; Citerio G; Baw B; Memish ZA; Hammond N; Hayden FG; Evans L; Rhodes A
  • Intensive Care Med 2020[May]; 46 (5): 854-887 PMID32222812show ga
  • BACKGROUND: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting thousands of people around the world. Urgent guidance for clinicians caring for the sickest of these patients is needed. METHODS: We formed a panel of 36 experts from 12 countries. All panel members completed the World Health Organization conflict of interest disclosure form. The panel proposed 53 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 in the ICU. We searched the literature for direct and indirect evidence on the management of COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the ICU. We identified relevant and recent systematic reviews on most questions relating to supportive care. We assessed the certainty in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, then generated recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice recommendations. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued 54 statements, of which 4 are best practice statements, 9 are strong recommendations, and 35 are weak recommendations. No recommendation was provided for 6 questions. The topics were: (1) infection control, (2) laboratory diagnosis and specimens, (3) hemodynamic support, (4) ventilatory support, and (5) COVID-19 therapy. CONCLUSION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued several recommendations to help support healthcare workers caring for critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. When available, we will provide new recommendations in further releases of these guidelines.
  • |Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Critical Care/*standards[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Intensive Care Units/*standards[MESH]
  • |Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Sepsis/diagnosis/etiology/*therapy[MESH]
  • |Survivors[MESH]

  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    854 5.46 2020