Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1093/ehjci/jez303

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/ehjci/jez303
suck pdf from google scholar
31848575!ä!31848575

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid31848575      Eur+Heart+J+Cardiovasc+Imaging 2021 ; 22 (1): 102-110
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Left atrial strain: a multi-modality, multi-vendor comparison study #MMPMID31848575
  • Pathan F; Zainal Abidin HA; Vo QH; Zhou H; D'Angelo T; Elen E; Negishi K; Puntmann VO; Marwick TH; Nagel E
  • Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021[Jan]; 22 (1): 102-110 PMID31848575show ga
  • AIMS: Left atrial (LA) strain is a prognostic biomarker with utility across a spectrum of acute and chronic cardiovascular pathologies. There are limited data on intervendor differences and no data on intermodality differences for LA strain. We sought to compare the intervendor and intermodality differences between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived LA strain. We hypothesized that various components of atrial strain would show good intervendor and intermodality correlation but that there would be systematic differences between vendors and modalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 54 subjects (43 patients with a clinical indication for CMR and 11 healthy volunteers) in a study comparing TTE- and CMR-derived LA reservoir strain (ER), conduit strain (ECD), and contractile strain (ECT). The LA strain components were evaluated using four dedicated types of post-processing software. We evaluated the correlation and systematic bias between modalities and within each modality. Intervendor and intermodality correlation was: ER [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 0.64-0.90)], ECD (ICC 0.62-0.89), and ECT (ICC 0.58-0.77). There was evidence of systematic bias between vendors and modalities with mean differences ranging from (3.1-12.2%) for ER, ECD (1.6-8.6%), and ECT (0.3-3.6%). Reproducibility analysis revealed intraobserver coefficient of variance (COV) of 6.5-14.6% and interobserver COV of 9.9-18.7%. CONCLUSION: Vendor derived ER, ECD, and ECT demonstrates modest to excellent intervendor and intermodality correlation depending on strain component examined. There are systematic differences in measurements depending on modality and vendor. These differences may be addressed by future studies, which, examine calibration of LA geometry/higher frame rate imaging, semi-quantitative approaches, and improvements in reproducibility.
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Algorithms[MESH]
  • |Atrial Function, Left/*physiology[MESH]
  • |Case-Control Studies[MESH]
  • |Contrast Media[MESH]
  • |Echocardiography/*instrumentation[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Heart Atria/*diagnostic imaging[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods[MESH]
  • |Magnetic Resonance Imaging/*instrumentation[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Myocardial Contraction[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box