Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020[Apr]; 39 (2): 269-277 PMID31843714show ga
OBJECTIVE: To develop French guidelines on the management of patients with severe abdominal trauma. DESIGN: A consensus committee of 20 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Societe francaise d'anesthesie et de reanimation, SFAR), the French Society of Emergency Medicine (Societe francaise de medecine d'urgence, SFMU), the French Society of Urology (Societe francaise d'urologie, SFU) and from the French Association of Surgery (Association francaise de chirurgie, AFC), the Val-de-Grace School (Ecole du Val-De-Grace, EVG) and the Federation for Interventional Radiology (Federation de radiologie interventionnelle, FRI-SFR) was convened. Declaration of all conflicts of interest (COI) policy by all participants was mandatory throughout the development of the guidelines. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for assessment of the available level of evidence with particular emphasis to avoid formulating strong recommendations in the absence of high level. Some recommendations were left ungraded. METHODS: The guidelines are divided in diagnostic and, therapeutic strategy and early surveillance. All questions were formulated according to Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) format. The panel focused on three questions for diagnostic strategy: (1) What is the diagnostic performance of clinical signs to suggest abdominal injury in trauma patients? (2) Suspecting abdominal trauma, what is the diagnostic performance of prehospital FAST (Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma) to rule in abdominal injury and guide the prehospital triage of the patient? and (3) When suspecting abdominal trauma, does carrying out a contrast enhanced thoraco-abdominal CT scan allow identification of abdominal injuries and reduction of mortality? Four questions dealt with therapeutic strategy: (1) After severe abdominal trauma, does immediate laparotomy reduce morbidity and mortality? (2) Does a "damage control surgery" strategy decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with a severe abdominal trauma? (3) Does a laparoscopic approach in patients with abdominal trauma decrease mortality or morbidity? and (4) Does non-operative management of patients with abdominal trauma without bleeding reduce mortality and morbidity? Finally, one question was formulated regarding the early monitoring of these patients: In case of severe abdominal trauma, which kind of initial monitoring does allow to reduce the morbi-mortality? The analysis of the literature and the recommendations were conducted following the GRADE(R) methodology. RESULTS: The SFAR/SFMU Guideline panel provided 15 statements on early management of severe abdominal trauma. After three rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong agreement was reached for 100% of recommendations. Of these recommendations, five have a high level of evidence (Grade 1+/-), six have a low level of evidence (Grade 2+/-) and four are expert judgments. Finally, no recommendation was provided for one question. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial agreement exists among experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best early management of severe abdominal trauma.
Anaesth+Crit+Care+Pain+Med 2020 ; 39 (2): 269-277
