Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/acm2.12765 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/acm2.12765 31729832!6964754!31729832     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Appl+Clin+Med+Phys 2020 ; 21 (1): 136-143 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=31729832|t=2020. Comparative performance analysis for abdominal phantom ROI detectability according to CT reconstruction algorithm: ADMIRE |pdf=|usr=}}{{31729832}} gab.com Text Comparative performance analysis for abdominal phantom ROI detectability according to CT reconstruction algorithm: ADMIRE JO: J Appl Clin Med Phys http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=31729832 #FOAvip PURPOSE: We compared and analyzed the detectability performance pertaining to an abdominal phantom including a region of interest (ROI) according to a computed tomography (CT) reconstruction algorithm. METHODS: Three types of reconstruction algorithms (FBP, SAFIRE, and ADMIRE) were used to evaluate the detectability performance using the abdominal phantom (phantom size: 25 x 18 x 28 cm(3) ). The vendor default settings for routine multi-detector computed tomography abdominal scans were used. As the quantitative evaluation method, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), difference in coefficient of variation (COV) with the normalization based on the FBP data, and the noise power spectrum (NPS) were measured. RESULTS: The characteristic of the ADMIRE-3 reconstructed image was higher than those of the FBP and SAFIRE-3 reconstructed images. The CNR values of the SAFIRE and ADMIRE images were much higher than the corresponding values of the FBP images. The difference in COV values for the ADMIRE images was ~1.2 times lower than the corresponding values of the SAFIRE images. CONCLUSION: The comparative analysis of the abdominal phantom low-contrast resolution differences for each CT exposure parameters showed that ADMIRE demonstrated better results than SAFIRE and FBP in terms of contrast, CNR, COV difference, and 1D NPS. This indicates that ADMIRE can provide a clearer observation even with the same number of contrast objects as compared to SAFIRE and FBP owing to its better contrast resolution in the central part of the contrast hole at low kV. Twit Text FOAVip Comparative performance analysis for abdominal phantom ROI detectability according to CT reconstruction algorithm: ADMIRE ????J Appl Clin Med Phys http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=31729832 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=31729832 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|31729832}}</ref> Comparative performance analysis for abdominal phantom ROI detectability according to CT reconstruction algorithm: ADMIRE #MMPMID31729832 Shin JB; Yoon DK; Pak S; Kwon YH; Suh TS J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020[Jan]; 21 (1): 136-143 PMID31729832show ga PURPOSE: We compared and analyzed the detectability performance pertaining to an abdominal phantom including a region of interest (ROI) according to a computed tomography (CT) reconstruction algorithm. METHODS: Three types of reconstruction algorithms (FBP, SAFIRE, and ADMIRE) were used to evaluate the detectability performance using the abdominal phantom (phantom size: 25 x 18 x 28 cm(3) ). The vendor default settings for routine multi-detector computed tomography abdominal scans were used. As the quantitative evaluation method, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), difference in coefficient of variation (COV) with the normalization based on the FBP data, and the noise power spectrum (NPS) were measured. RESULTS: The characteristic of the ADMIRE-3 reconstructed image was higher than those of the FBP and SAFIRE-3 reconstructed images. The CNR values of the SAFIRE and ADMIRE images were much higher than the corresponding values of the FBP images. The difference in COV values for the ADMIRE images was ~1.2 times lower than the corresponding values of the SAFIRE images. CONCLUSION: The comparative analysis of the abdominal phantom low-contrast resolution differences for each CT exposure parameters showed that ADMIRE demonstrated better results than SAFIRE and FBP in terms of contrast, CNR, COV difference, and 1D NPS. This indicates that ADMIRE can provide a clearer observation even with the same number of contrast objects as compared to SAFIRE and FBP owing to its better contrast resolution in the central part of the contrast hole at low kV. |*Algorithms[MESH] |*Phantoms, Imaging[MESH] |Abdomen/*diagnostic imaging[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Radiation Dosage[MESH] |Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/*methods[MESH] |Radiography, Thoracic/*methods[MESH]Comparative performance analysis for abdominal phantom ROI detectabili(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing