Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.23750/abm.v88i5-S.6858 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.23750/abm.v88i5-S.6858 29189705/?report=reader!6357580!29189705     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Acta+Biomed 2017 ; 88 (5S): 48-54 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29189705|t=2017. Validation of the Italian version of the Critical Pain Observation Tool in brain-injured critically ill adults |pdf=|usr=}}{{29189705}} gab.com Text Validation of the Italian version of the Critical Pain Observation Tool in brain-injured critically ill adults JO: Acta Biomed http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29189705 #FOAvip BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pain in intensive care units (ICUs) is a frequent and often undermanaged problem. Brain-injured patients are often unable to reliably self-report their pain, calling forth the need to use behavioural scales such as the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT). This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Italian CPOT use with brain-injured ICU adults. METHOD: A sample of 50 adults critical care patients was included. Each patient was assessed by two independent observers at three predefined times - at rest; during mobilization for hygiene; 20 minutes later - using the CPOT, PAINAD, and NRS. RESULTS: A good correlation was found between independent observers scores during painful procedure, establishing interrater reliability of CPOT. Criterion validation was supported by a strong correlation between CPOT and PAINAD scores, and a moderate relation between CPOT and NRS scores. The CPOT was able to discriminate between patients undergoing painful versus non-painful procedures. However, PAINAD performed better in this sample, as revealed by the comparison between the two AUC of ROC curves. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian CPOT use was found reliable and valid in this patient group. Twit Text FOAVip Validation of the Italian version of the Critical Pain Observation Tool in brain-injured critically ill adults ????Acta Biomed http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29189705 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29189705 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29189705}}</ref> Validation of the Italian version of the Critical Pain Observation Tool in brain-injured critically ill adults #MMPMID29189705 Sulla F; De Souza Ramos N; Terzi N; Trenta T; Uneddu M; Zaldivar Cruces MA; Sarli L Acta Biomed 2017[Nov]; 88 (5S): 48-54 PMID29189705show ga BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pain in intensive care units (ICUs) is a frequent and often undermanaged problem. Brain-injured patients are often unable to reliably self-report their pain, calling forth the need to use behavioural scales such as the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT). This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Italian CPOT use with brain-injured ICU adults. METHOD: A sample of 50 adults critical care patients was included. Each patient was assessed by two independent observers at three predefined times - at rest; during mobilization for hygiene; 20 minutes later - using the CPOT, PAINAD, and NRS. RESULTS: A good correlation was found between independent observers scores during painful procedure, establishing interrater reliability of CPOT. Criterion validation was supported by a strong correlation between CPOT and PAINAD scores, and a moderate relation between CPOT and NRS scores. The CPOT was able to discriminate between patients undergoing painful versus non-painful procedures. However, PAINAD performed better in this sample, as revealed by the comparison between the two AUC of ROC curves. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian CPOT use was found reliable and valid in this patient group. |*Critical Care[MESH] |Brain Injuries/*physiopathology[MESH] |Critical Illness[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Intensive Care Units[MESH] |Italy[MESH]Validation of the Italian version of the Critical Pain Observation Too(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing