Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1093/annonc/mdr610 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/annonc/mdr610 22331640Sarcoma:concordancebetweeninitialdiagnosisandcentralizedexpertreviewinapopulation-basedstudywithinthreeEuropeanregions.!3425368!22331640     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Ann+Oncol 2012 ; 23 (9): 2442-2449 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=22331640|t=2012. Sarcoma: concordance between initial diagnosis and centralized expert review in a population-based study within three European regions |pdf=|usr=}}{{22331640}} gab.com Text Sarcoma: concordance between initial diagnosis and centralized expert review in a population-based study within three European regions JO: Ann Oncol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=22331640 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. Accurate determination of histological diagnosis and prognostic factors is critical for the delineation of treatment strategies. The contribution of second opinion (SO) to improve diagnostic accuracy has been suggested for sarcoma but has never been established in population-based studies. METHODS: Histological data of patients diagnosed with sarcoma in Rhone-Alpes (France), Veneto (Italy) and Aquitaine (France) over a 2-year period were collected. Initial diagnoses were systematically compared with SO from regional and national experts. RESULTS: Of 2016 selected patients, 1463 (73%) matched the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Full concordance between primary diagnosis and SO (the first pathologist and the expert reached identical conclusions) was observed in 824 (56%) cases, partial concordance (identical diagnosis of connective tumor but different grade or histological subtype) in 518 (35%) cases and complete discordance (benign versus malignant, different histological type or invalidation of the diagnosis of sarcoma) in 121 (8%) cases. The major discrepancies were related to histological grade (n = 274, 43%), histological type (n = 144, 24%), subtype (n = 18, 3%) and grade plus subtype or grade plus histological type (n = 178, 29%). CONCLUSION: More than 40% of first histological diagnoses were modified at second reading, possibly resulting in different treatment decisions. Twit Text FOAVip Sarcoma: concordance between initial diagnosis and centralized expert review in a population-based study within three European regions ????Ann Oncol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=22331640 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=22331640 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|22331640}}</ref> Sarcoma: concordance between initial diagnosis and centralized expert review in a population-based study within three European regions #MMPMID22331640 Ray-Coquard I; Montesco MC; Coindre JM; Dei Tos AP; Lurkin A; Ranchere-Vince D; Vecchiato A; Decouvelaere AV; Mathoulin-Pelissier S; Albert S; Cousin P; Cellier D; Toffolatti L; Rossi CR; Blay JY Ann Oncol 2012[Sep]; 23 (9): 2442-2449 PMID22331640show ga BACKGROUND: Sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. Accurate determination of histological diagnosis and prognostic factors is critical for the delineation of treatment strategies. The contribution of second opinion (SO) to improve diagnostic accuracy has been suggested for sarcoma but has never been established in population-based studies. METHODS: Histological data of patients diagnosed with sarcoma in Rhone-Alpes (France), Veneto (Italy) and Aquitaine (France) over a 2-year period were collected. Initial diagnoses were systematically compared with SO from regional and national experts. RESULTS: Of 2016 selected patients, 1463 (73%) matched the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Full concordance between primary diagnosis and SO (the first pathologist and the expert reached identical conclusions) was observed in 824 (56%) cases, partial concordance (identical diagnosis of connective tumor but different grade or histological subtype) in 518 (35%) cases and complete discordance (benign versus malignant, different histological type or invalidation of the diagnosis of sarcoma) in 121 (8%) cases. The major discrepancies were related to histological grade (n = 274, 43%), histological type (n = 144, 24%), subtype (n = 18, 3%) and grade plus subtype or grade plus histological type (n = 178, 29%). CONCLUSION: More than 40% of first histological diagnoses were modified at second reading, possibly resulting in different treatment decisions. |*Referral and Consultation[MESH] |Abdominal Neoplasms/*diagnosis[MESH] |Adolescent[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Aged, 80 and over[MESH] |Diagnosis, Differential[MESH] |Female[MESH] |France[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Italy[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Neoplasm Grading[MESH] |Population[MESH] |Sarcoma/*diagnosis[MESH]Sarcoma: concordance between initial diagnosis and centralized expert (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing