Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.11613/BM.2017.029 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.11613/BM.2017.029 C5493177!5493177 !28694718     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=28694718 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\28694718 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Biochem+Med+(Zagreb) 2017 ; 27 (2 ): 273-278 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28694718 |t=2017. What I learned from predatory publishers |pdf=|usr=}}{{28694718 }} gab.com Text What I learned from predatory publishers JO: Biochem Med (Zagreb) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28694718 #FOAvip This article is a first-hand account of the author's work identifying and listing predatory publishers from 2012 to 2017. Predatory publishers use the gold (author pays) open access model and aim to generate as much revenue as possible, often foregoing a proper peer review. The paper details how predatory publishers came to exist and shows how they were largely enabled and condoned by the open-access social movement, the scholarly publishing industry, and academic librarians. The author describes tactics predatory publishers used to attempt to be removed from his lists, details the damage predatory journals cause to science, and comments on the future of scholarly publishing. Twit Text FOAVip What I learned from predatory publishers ????Biochem Med (Zagreb) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28694718 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28694718 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28694718 }}</ref> What I learned from predatory publishers #MMPMID28694718 Beall J Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2017[Jun]; 27 (2 ): 273-278 PMID28694718 show ga This article is a first-hand account of the author's work identifying and listing predatory publishers from 2012 to 2017. Predatory publishers use the gold (author pays) open access model and aim to generate as much revenue as possible, often foregoing a proper peer review. The paper details how predatory publishers came to exist and shows how they were largely enabled and condoned by the open-access social movement, the scholarly publishing industry, and academic librarians. The author describes tactics predatory publishers used to attempt to be removed from his lists, details the damage predatory journals cause to science, and comments on the future of scholarly publishing. |*Internet [MESH] |Access to Information [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Journalism/*standards/statistics & numerical data [MESH] |Open Access Publishing/*standards/statistics & numerical data [MESH] |Peer Review, Research/*standards [MESH] |Periodicals as Topic/standards/statistics & numerical data [MESH]What I learned from predatory publishers (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing