Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/cdev.12263 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/cdev.12263 C4807134!4807134 !24990627     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=24990627 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\24990627 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Child+Dev 2014 ; 85 (5 ): 1795-804 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=24990627 |t=2014. The Goldilocks effect in infant auditory attention |pdf=|usr=}}{{24990627 }} gab.com Text The Goldilocks effect in infant auditory attention JO: Child Dev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24990627 #FOAvip Infants must learn about many cognitive domains (e.g., language, music) from auditory statistics, yet capacity limits on their cognitive resources restrict the quantity that they can encode. Previous research has established that infants can attend to only a subset of available acoustic input. Yet few previous studies have directly examined infant auditory attention, and none have directly tested theorized mechanisms of attentional selection based on stimulus complexity. This work utilizes model-based behavioral methods that were recently developed to examine visual attention in infants (e.g., Kidd, Piantadosi, & Aslin, 2012). The present results demonstrate that 7- to 8-month-old infants selectively attend to nonsocial auditory stimuli that are intermediately predictable/complex with respect to their current implicit beliefs and expectations. These findings provide evidence of a broad principle of infant attention across modalities and suggest that sound-to-sound transitional statistics heavily influence the allocation of auditory attention in human infants. Twit Text FOAVip The Goldilocks effect in infant auditory attention ????Child Dev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24990627 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24990627 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|24990627 }}</ref> The Goldilocks effect in infant auditory attention #MMPMID24990627 Kidd C ; Piantadosi ST ; Aslin RN Child Dev 2014[Sep]; 85 (5 ): 1795-804 PMID24990627 show ga Infants must learn about many cognitive domains (e.g., language, music) from auditory statistics, yet capacity limits on their cognitive resources restrict the quantity that they can encode. Previous research has established that infants can attend to only a subset of available acoustic input. Yet few previous studies have directly examined infant auditory attention, and none have directly tested theorized mechanisms of attentional selection based on stimulus complexity. This work utilizes model-based behavioral methods that were recently developed to examine visual attention in infants (e.g., Kidd, Piantadosi, & Aslin, 2012). The present results demonstrate that 7- to 8-month-old infants selectively attend to nonsocial auditory stimuli that are intermediately predictable/complex with respect to their current implicit beliefs and expectations. These findings provide evidence of a broad principle of infant attention across modalities and suggest that sound-to-sound transitional statistics heavily influence the allocation of auditory attention in human infants. |Attention/*physiology [MESH] |Auditory Perception/*physiology [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Infant [MESH] |Infant Behavior/*physiology [MESH]The Goldilocks effect in infant auditory attention (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing