Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s00431-017-2972-2 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s00431-017-2972-2 C5563334!5563334 !28762070     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\28762070 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Eur+J+Pediatr 2017 ; 176 (9 ): 1155-1162 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28762070 |t=2017. Systematic review: probiotics for functional constipation in children |pdf=|usr=}}{{28762070 }} gab.com Text Systematic review: probiotics for functional constipation in children JO: Eur J Pediatr http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28762070 #FOAvip We updated our 2010 systematic review on the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of constipation in children. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases; clinical trial registries; and reference lists of included studies were searched to February 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in children, with no language restriction. The primary outcome measure was treatment success, as defined by the investigators. We included seven RCTs with a total of 515 participants. Included trials were heterogeneous with respect to study population, probiotic strains, dosages, study duration, and follow-up. Pooled results of two RCTs showed no significant difference between the Lactobacillus rhamnosus casei Lcr35 and placebo groups with respect to treatment success. Other probiotics were studied in single trials only. There was no significant difference between the probiotic and control groups with respect to treatment success. While some probiotic strains showed some effects on defecation frequency, none of the probiotics had beneficial effects on frequency of fecal incontinence or frequency of abdominal pain. Adverse events were rare and not serious. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence does not support the use of any of currently evaluated probiotics in the treatment of functional constipation in children. What is Known: ? Conventional treatment for functional constipation in children does not always provide satisfying improvement. ? Probiotics have been suggested as potential treatment modalities for this condition. What is New: ? Probiotics are ineffective for the management of functional constipation in children in terms of treatment success, frequency of fecal incontinence, and frequency of abdominal pain. Twit Text FOAVip Systematic review: probiotics for functional constipation in children ????Eur J Pediatr http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28762070 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28762070 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28762070 }}</ref> Systematic review: probiotics for functional constipation in children #MMPMID28762070 Wojtyniak K ; Szajewska H Eur J Pediatr 2017[Sep]; 176 (9 ): 1155-1162 PMID28762070 show ga We updated our 2010 systematic review on the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of constipation in children. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases; clinical trial registries; and reference lists of included studies were searched to February 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in children, with no language restriction. The primary outcome measure was treatment success, as defined by the investigators. We included seven RCTs with a total of 515 participants. Included trials were heterogeneous with respect to study population, probiotic strains, dosages, study duration, and follow-up. Pooled results of two RCTs showed no significant difference between the Lactobacillus rhamnosus casei Lcr35 and placebo groups with respect to treatment success. Other probiotics were studied in single trials only. There was no significant difference between the probiotic and control groups with respect to treatment success. While some probiotic strains showed some effects on defecation frequency, none of the probiotics had beneficial effects on frequency of fecal incontinence or frequency of abdominal pain. Adverse events were rare and not serious. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence does not support the use of any of currently evaluated probiotics in the treatment of functional constipation in children. What is Known: ? Conventional treatment for functional constipation in children does not always provide satisfying improvement. ? Probiotics have been suggested as potential treatment modalities for this condition. What is New: ? Probiotics are ineffective for the management of functional constipation in children in terms of treatment success, frequency of fecal incontinence, and frequency of abdominal pain. |Abdominal Pain/etiology/therapy [MESH] |Case-Control Studies [MESH] |Child [MESH] |Constipation/*therapy [MESH] |Fecal Incontinence/etiology/therapy [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Lactobacillus [MESH] |Probiotics/*administration & dosage [MESH] |Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic [MESH]Systematic review: probiotics for functional constipation in children (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing