Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x
suck pdf from google scholar
C4450839!4450839 !26032861
unlimited free pdf from europmc26032861
    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26032861 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117
pmid26032861
      BMC+Surg 2015 ; 15 (ä): 69
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis #MMPMID26032861
  • Sandell E ; Berg M ; Sandblom G ; Sundman J ; Fränneby U ; Boström L ; Andrén-Sandberg Å
  • BMC Surg 2015[Jun]; 15 (ä): 69 PMID26032861 show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal conditions. Among other parameters, the decision to perform surgical exploration in suspected appendicitis involves diagnostic accuracy, patient age and co-morbidity, patient's own wishes, the surgeon's core medical values, expected natural course of non-operative treatment and priority considerations regarding the use of limited resources. Do objective clinical findings, such as radiology and laboratory results, have greater impact on decision-making than "soft" clinical variables? In this study we investigate the parameters that surgeons consider significant in decision-making in cases of suspected appendicitis; specifically we describe the process leading to surgical intervention in real settings. The purpose of the study was to explore the process behind the decision to undertake surgery on a patient with suspected appendicitis as a model for decision-making in surgery. METHODS: All appendectomy procedures (n = 201) at the Department of Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital performed in 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Every two consecutive patients seeking for abdominal pain after each case undergoing surgery were included as controls. Signs and symptoms documented in the medical records were registered according to a standardized protocol. The outcome of this retrospective review formed the basis of a prospective registration of patients undergoing appendectomy. During a three- month period in 2011, the surgeons who made the decision to perform acute appendectomy on 117 consecutive appendectomized patients at the Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, and Södersjukhuset, were asked to answer a questionnaire about symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures considered in their treatment decision. They were also asked which three symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures had the greatest impact on their decision to perform appendectomy. RESULTS: In the retrospective review, tenderness in the right fossa had the greatest impact (OR 76) on treatment decision. In the prospective registration, the most frequent symptom present at treatment decision was pain in the right fossa (94 %). Tenderness in the right fossa (69 %) was also most important for the decision to perform surgery. Apart from local status, image diagnostics and blood sample results had the greatest impact. CONCLUSION: Local tenderness in the right fossa, lab results and the results of radiological investigations had the greatest impact on treatment decision.
  • |*Appendectomy [MESH]
  • |Abdominal Pain/etiology [MESH]
  • |Acute Disease [MESH]
  • |Adult [MESH]
  • |Aged [MESH]
  • |Appendicitis/complications/*diagnosis/surgery [MESH]
  • |Clinical Decision-Making/*methods [MESH]
  • |Diagnosis, Differential [MESH]
  • |Female [MESH]
  • |Humans [MESH]
  • |Male [MESH]
  • |Middle Aged [MESH]
  • |Practice Patterns, Physicians'/*statistics & numerical data [MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies [MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box