Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1186/s12859-017-1614-z

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s12859-017-1614-z
suck pdf from google scholar
C5374669!5374669 !28359297
unlimited free pdf from europmc28359297
    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\28359297 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117
pmid28359297
      BMC+Bioinformatics 2017 ; 18 (1 ): 199
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Significance evaluation in factor graphs #MMPMID28359297
  • Madsen T ; Hobolth A ; Jensen JL ; Pedersen JS
  • BMC Bioinformatics 2017[Mar]; 18 (1 ): 199 PMID28359297 show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Factor graphs provide a flexible and general framework for specifying probability distributions. They can capture a range of popular and recent models for analysis of both genomics data as well as data from other scientific fields. Owing to the ever larger data sets encountered in genomics and the multiple-testing issues accompanying them, accurate significance evaluation is of great importance. We here address the problem of evaluating statistical significance of observations from factor graph models. RESULTS: Two novel numerical approximations for evaluation of statistical significance are presented. First a method using importance sampling. Second a saddlepoint approximation based method. We develop algorithms to efficiently compute the approximations and compare them to naive sampling and the normal approximation. The individual merits of the methods are analysed both from a theoretical viewpoint and with simulations. A guideline for choosing between the normal approximation, saddle-point approximation and importance sampling is also provided. Finally, the applicability of the methods is demonstrated with examples from cancer genomics, motif-analysis and phylogenetics. CONCLUSIONS: The applicability of saddlepoint approximation and importance sampling is demonstrated on known models in the factor graph framework. Using the two methods we can substantially improve computational cost without compromising accuracy. This contribution allows analyses of large datasets in the general factor graph framework.
  • |*Algorithms [MESH]
  • |*Models, Theoretical [MESH]
  • |Amino Acid Sequence [MESH]
  • |CCCTC-Binding Factor [MESH]
  • |Computational Biology/*methods [MESH]
  • |Genomics [MESH]
  • |Humans [MESH]
  • |MCF-7 Cells [MESH]
  • |Neoplasms/diagnosis/genetics [MESH]
  • |Phylogeny [MESH]
  • |Probability [MESH]
  • |Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs [MESH]
  • |Repressor Proteins [MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box