Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1200/JOP.2017.020909

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1200/JOP.2017.020909
suck pdf from google scholar
C5508447!5508447 !28697319
unlimited free pdf from europmc28697319
    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=28697319 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid28697319
      J+Oncol+Pract 2017 ; 13 (7 ): 414-421
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Renal Medullary Carcinoma: Establishing Standards in Practice #MMPMID28697319
  • Beckermann KE ; Sharma D ; Chaturvedi S ; Msaouel P ; Abboud MR ; Allory Y ; Bourdeaut F ; Calderaro J ; de Cubas AA ; Derebail VK ; Hong AL ; Naik RP ; Malouf GG ; Mullen EA ; Reuter VE ; Roberts CWM ; Walker CL ; Wood CG ; DeBaun MR ; Van Poppel H ; Tannir NM ; Rathmell WK
  • J Oncol Pract 2017[Jul]; 13 (7 ): 414-421 PMID28697319 show ga
  • Although renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare subtype of kidney cancer, it is particularly devastating in that it is nearly uniformly lethal. No established guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of RMC. In April 2016, a panel of experts developed clinical guidelines on the basis of a literature review and consensus statements. The goal was to propose recommendations for standardized diagnostic and management approaches and to establish an international clinical registry and biorepository for RMC. Published data are limited to case reports and small retrospective reviews. The RMC Working Group prepared recommendations to inform providers and patients faced with a low level of medical evidence. The diagnosis of RMC should be considered in all patients younger than 50 years with poorly differentiated carcinoma that arises from the renal medulla. These patients should be tested for sickle cell hemoglobinopathies, and if positive, SMARCB1/INI1 loss should be confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The majority of patients with RMC are diagnosed with metastatic disease. Upfront radical nephrectomy should be considered in patients with good performance status and low metastatic burden or after response to systemic therapy. Currently, cytotoxic, platinum-based chemotherapy provides the best, albeit brief, palliative clinical benefit. Vascular endothelial growth factor-directed therapies and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are ineffective in RMC as monotherapy. Therapeutic trials of novel agents are now available for RMC, and every effort should be made to enroll patients in clinical studies.
  • |*Carcinoma, Medullary/diagnosis/epidemiology/therapy [MESH]
  • |*Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis/epidemiology/therapy [MESH]
  • |*Practice Guidelines as Topic [MESH]
  • |Anemia, Sickle Cell/epidemiology [MESH]
  • |Humans [MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box