Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1038/gim.2013.170 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/gim.2013.170 C4597884!4597884 !24310310     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=24310310 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\24310310 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Genet+Med 2014 ; 16 (6 ): 442-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=24310310 |t=2014. Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing |pdf=|usr=}}{{24310310 }} gab.com Text Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing JO: Genet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24310310 #FOAvip PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the implications of sequencing information and stated preferences for return of results among research participants. METHODS: Six focus groups were held with 39 ClinSeq participants. The groups included participants who had received results, those who had not, those affected with cardiovascular disease, and healthy adults. Audio recordings of the sessions were transcribed and coded and analyzed for themes. RESULTS: All participants expressed interest in receiving results that are medically actionable, nonactionable, carrier, and less so variants that cannot be interpreted. Most participants preferred to receive results in person, although several endorsed use of Internet-based resources that they could return to. Participants identified benefits for health management along with satisfying curiosity, making scientific contributions, and partnering in research. Value was seen in gaining control over health risks. Concerns were distress and/or fear that may result. Some participants were opposed to or ambivalent about learning certain types of results, particularly those having to do with diseases that were incurable or that might have implications for the health of their children. CONCLUSION: There was relative enthusiasm about the value of learning sequencing information, yet it was tempered by concern about negative feeling responses and aversion to learning about incurable conditions. Twit Text FOAVip Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing ????Genet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24310310 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24310310 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|24310310 }}</ref> Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing #MMPMID24310310 Wright MF ; Lewis KL ; Fisher TC ; Hooker GW ; Emanuel TE ; Biesecker LG ; Biesecker BB Genet Med 2014[Jun]; 16 (6 ): 442-7 PMID24310310 show ga PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the implications of sequencing information and stated preferences for return of results among research participants. METHODS: Six focus groups were held with 39 ClinSeq participants. The groups included participants who had received results, those who had not, those affected with cardiovascular disease, and healthy adults. Audio recordings of the sessions were transcribed and coded and analyzed for themes. RESULTS: All participants expressed interest in receiving results that are medically actionable, nonactionable, carrier, and less so variants that cannot be interpreted. Most participants preferred to receive results in person, although several endorsed use of Internet-based resources that they could return to. Participants identified benefits for health management along with satisfying curiosity, making scientific contributions, and partnering in research. Value was seen in gaining control over health risks. Concerns were distress and/or fear that may result. Some participants were opposed to or ambivalent about learning certain types of results, particularly those having to do with diseases that were incurable or that might have implications for the health of their children. CONCLUSION: There was relative enthusiasm about the value of learning sequencing information, yet it was tempered by concern about negative feeling responses and aversion to learning about incurable conditions. |*Exome [MESH] |*Genetic Research/ethics [MESH] |Aged [MESH] |Cardiovascular Diseases/genetics [MESH] |Emotions [MESH] |Female [MESH] |Genetic Counseling/*psychology [MESH] |Genome, Human [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Intention [MESH] |Male [MESH] |Middle Aged [MESH] |Patient Preference [MESH]Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequenci(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing