Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.ihj.2016.03.033 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.03.033 C4990729!4990729 !27543481     free     free     free Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\27543481 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Indian+Heart+J 2016 ; 68 (4 ): 552-8 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27543481 |t=2016. Physiological cardiac pacing: Current status |pdf=|usr=}}{{27543481 }} gab.com Text Physiological cardiac pacing: Current status JO: Indian Heart J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27543481 #FOAvip Adverse hemodynamics of right ventricular (RV) pacing is a well-known fact. It was believed to be the result of atrio-ventricular (AV) dyssynchrony and sequential pacing of the atrium and ventricle may solve these problems. However, despite maintenance of AV synchrony, the dual chamber pacemakers in different trials have failed to show its superiority over single chamber RV apical pacing in terms of death, progression of heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (AF). As a consequence, investigators searched for alternate pacing sites with a more physiological activation pattern and better hemodynamics. Direct His bundle pacing and Para-Hisian pacing are the most physiological ventricular pacing sites. But, this is technically difficult. Ventricular septal pacing compared to apical pacing results in a shorter electrical activation delay and consequently less mechanical dyssynchrony. But, the study results are heterogeneous. Selective site atria pacing (atrial septal) is useful for patients with atrial conduction disorders in prevention of AF. Twit Text FOAVip Physiological cardiac pacing: Current status ????Indian Heart J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27543481 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27543481 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27543481 }}</ref> Physiological cardiac pacing: Current status #MMPMID27543481 Das A ; Kahali D Indian Heart J 2016[Jul]; 68 (4 ): 552-8 PMID27543481 show ga Adverse hemodynamics of right ventricular (RV) pacing is a well-known fact. It was believed to be the result of atrio-ventricular (AV) dyssynchrony and sequential pacing of the atrium and ventricle may solve these problems. However, despite maintenance of AV synchrony, the dual chamber pacemakers in different trials have failed to show its superiority over single chamber RV apical pacing in terms of death, progression of heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (AF). As a consequence, investigators searched for alternate pacing sites with a more physiological activation pattern and better hemodynamics. Direct His bundle pacing and Para-Hisian pacing are the most physiological ventricular pacing sites. But, this is technically difficult. Ventricular septal pacing compared to apical pacing results in a shorter electrical activation delay and consequently less mechanical dyssynchrony. But, the study results are heterogeneous. Selective site atria pacing (atrial septal) is useful for patients with atrial conduction disorders in prevention of AF. |*Hemodynamics [MESH] |Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology/*therapy [MESH] |Bundle of His/*physiopathology [MESH] |Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/*methods [MESH] |Electrocardiography [MESH]Physiological cardiac pacing: Current status (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing