Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1038/gim.2016.16 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/gim.2016.16 C5035552!5035552 !27011058     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=27011058 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\27011058 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Genet+Med 2016 ; 18 (11 ): 1136-1142 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27011058 |t=2016. Patient safety in genomic medicine: an exploratory study |pdf=|usr=}}{{27011058 }} gab.com Text Patient safety in genomic medicine: an exploratory study JO: Genet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27011058 #FOAvip PURPOSE: Concerns about patient safety and the potential for medical error are largely unexplored for genetic testing, despite the expansion of test use. In this preliminary qualitative study, we sought the views of genetics professionals about error and patient safety concerns in genomic medicine and factors that might mitigate them. METHODS: Twelve semistructured interviews with experienced genetics professionals were conducted. Transcripts were analyzed using selective coding for issues related to error definition, mitigation, and communication. Additional thematic analysis captured themes across content categories. RESULTS: Key informants suggested that the potential for adverse events exists in all phases of genetic testing, from ordering to analysis, interpretation, and follow-up. A perceived contributor was lack of physician knowledge about genetics, resulting in errors in test ordering and interpretation. The limitations and uncertainty inherent to rapidly evolving technology were also seen as contributing factors. Strategies to prevent errors included physician education, availability of genetic experts for consultation, and enhanced communication such as improved test reports and electronic decision support. CONCLUSION: Genetic testing poses concerns for patient safety due to errors and the limitations of current tests. As genomic tests are integrated into medical care, anticipating and addressing patient safety concerns identified by these key informants will be crucial.Genet Med 18 11, 1136-1142. Twit Text FOAVip Patient safety in genomic medicine: an exploratory study ????Genet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27011058 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27011058 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27011058 }}</ref> Patient safety in genomic medicine: an exploratory study #MMPMID27011058 Korngiebel DM ; Fullerton SM ; Burke W Genet Med 2016[Nov]; 18 (11 ): 1136-1142 PMID27011058 show ga PURPOSE: Concerns about patient safety and the potential for medical error are largely unexplored for genetic testing, despite the expansion of test use. In this preliminary qualitative study, we sought the views of genetics professionals about error and patient safety concerns in genomic medicine and factors that might mitigate them. METHODS: Twelve semistructured interviews with experienced genetics professionals were conducted. Transcripts were analyzed using selective coding for issues related to error definition, mitigation, and communication. Additional thematic analysis captured themes across content categories. RESULTS: Key informants suggested that the potential for adverse events exists in all phases of genetic testing, from ordering to analysis, interpretation, and follow-up. A perceived contributor was lack of physician knowledge about genetics, resulting in errors in test ordering and interpretation. The limitations and uncertainty inherent to rapidly evolving technology were also seen as contributing factors. Strategies to prevent errors included physician education, availability of genetic experts for consultation, and enhanced communication such as improved test reports and electronic decision support. CONCLUSION: Genetic testing poses concerns for patient safety due to errors and the limitations of current tests. As genomic tests are integrated into medical care, anticipating and addressing patient safety concerns identified by these key informants will be crucial.Genet Med 18 11, 1136-1142. |*Genomics [MESH] |*Medical Errors [MESH] |Adult [MESH] |Attitude of Health Personnel [MESH] |Female [MESH] |Genetic Testing/ethics/*standards [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Male [MESH] |Patient Safety/*standards [MESH] |Precision Medicine [MESH] |Qualitative Research [MESH]Patient safety in genomic medicine: an exploratory study (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing