Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56 C4898932!4898932 !27350794     free     free     free Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\27350794 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Ecancermedicalscience 2016 ; 10 (ä): ed56 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27350794 |t=2016. Open Science and Research Reproducibility |pdf=|usr=}}{{27350794 }} gab.com Text Open Science and Research Reproducibility JO: Ecancermedicalscience http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27350794 #FOAvip Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials and data, and posting preprints of manuscripts may serve to improve quality control procedures at every stage of the research pipeline, and in turn improve the reproducibility of published work. Twit Text FOAVip Open Science and Research Reproducibility ????Ecancermedicalscience http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27350794 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27350794 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27350794 }}</ref> Open Science and Research Reproducibility #MMPMID27350794 Munafò M Ecancermedicalscience 2016[]; 10 (ä): ed56 PMID27350794 show ga Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials and data, and posting preprints of manuscripts may serve to improve quality control procedures at every stage of the research pipeline, and in turn improve the reproducibility of published work. äOpen Science and Research Reproducibility (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing