Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26635705
&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26635705
.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117 Front+Psychol
2015 ; 6
(ä): 1815
Nephropedia Template TP
gab.com Text
Twit Text FOAVip
Twit Text #
English Wikipedia
Observing Social Exclusion Leads to Dehumanizing the Victim
#MMPMID26635705
Park YO
; Park SH
Front Psychol
2015[]; 6
(ä): 1815
PMID26635705
show ga
We hypothesized that observing social exclusion would influence observers'
judgments of the humanness of its victims and perpetrators. Specifically, we
speculated that people would attribute victims and perpetrators to lower and
higher mental capacities, respectively. Participants observed a simulated
computer-based ball tossing game in which one of the players was either
ostracized or not. They then rated the game players on traits associated with two
dimensions of humanness, namely Human Nature (HN) and Human Uniqueness (HU).
Overall, participants who witnessed an exclusion game judged the victim as less
human on both domains compared to one of the perpetrators as well as to a player
in the control condition. The perpetrator was attributed higher HN, but not
significantly higher HU, compared to the control player. In addition, the less HN
attributes a target was assigned, the more she was expected to be vulnerable to
exploitation. On most of the other measures of target impression, however, the
victim was rated more favorably than the perpetrator. The findings imply that
social exclusion victims are often subtly derogated compared to the perpetrators,
even while they are also more positively evaluated otherwise.