Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s12178-015-9291-x http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s12178-015-9291-x C4630235!4630235!26362647     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26362647&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26362647.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Curr+Rev+Musculoskelet+Med 2015 ; 8 (4): 361-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26362647|t=2015. Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty |pdf=|usr=}}{{26362647}} gab.com Text Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty JO: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26362647 #FOAvip The etiology of bone loss encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often multifactorial and can include stress shielding, osteolysis, osteonecrosis, infection, mechanical loss due to a grossly loose implant, and iatrogenic loss at the time of implant resection. Selection of the reconstructive technique(s) to manage bone deficiency is determined by the location and magnitude of bone loss, ligament integrity, surgeon experience, and patient factors including the potential for additional revision, functional demand, and comorbidities. Smaller, contained defects are reliably managed with bone graft, cement augmented with screw fixation, or modular augments. Large metaphyseal defects require more extensive reconstruction such as impaction bone grafting with or without mesh augmentation, prosthetic augmentation, use of bulk structural allografts, or use of metaphyseal cones or sleeves. While each technique has advantages and disadvantages, the most optimal method for reconstruction of large metaphyseal bone defects during revision TKA is not clearly established. Twit Text FOAVip Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty ????Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26362647 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26362647 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26362647}}</ref> Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty #MMPMID26362647 Ponzio DY; Austin MS Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2015[Dec]; 8 (4): 361-7 PMID26362647show ga The etiology of bone loss encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often multifactorial and can include stress shielding, osteolysis, osteonecrosis, infection, mechanical loss due to a grossly loose implant, and iatrogenic loss at the time of implant resection. Selection of the reconstructive technique(s) to manage bone deficiency is determined by the location and magnitude of bone loss, ligament integrity, surgeon experience, and patient factors including the potential for additional revision, functional demand, and comorbidities. Smaller, contained defects are reliably managed with bone graft, cement augmented with screw fixation, or modular augments. Large metaphyseal defects require more extensive reconstruction such as impaction bone grafting with or without mesh augmentation, prosthetic augmentation, use of bulk structural allografts, or use of metaphyseal cones or sleeves. While each technique has advantages and disadvantages, the most optimal method for reconstruction of large metaphyseal bone defects during revision TKA is not clearly established. äMetaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing